
Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
You can talk to staff here about general issues, but not about how to post! You can get that information here:
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
The ultimate noob guide
44.1k
80
11
7 years ago
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
111.4k
71
2,227
12 years ago
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
159.6k
136
4,367
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
This is just a heads up to everyone.
We are currently doing some maintenance work on the site to improve performance. If you run into any errors, please let us know here.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
We are currently doing some maintenance work on the site to improve performance. If you run into any errors, please let us know here.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
@Queen The answer it's exactly the same that I tried each time since the first one. It's not the first time that I have an error when I click on Submit button so, I'm used to copy every answer before I sent it.
Also as a general note to everybody.
The answer, that finally gets marked correct - should be the Best Answer rather than the first one. Side note, we are thinking about ways to share points between all contributors, so question could be answered "collectively" meaning possibly separate points for name/scene and media.
When you are confirming. Keep in mind that you are "vouching" for that answer. So try to confirm the best possible answer. For example, try not to confirm answers that may have the correct name, if the OP is looking for the video.
And also a big THANK YOU to all NTP Contributors! You guys are absolutely essential to the continued growth of this site!
The answer, that finally gets marked correct - should be the Best Answer rather than the first one. Side note, we are thinking about ways to share points between all contributors, so question could be answered "collectively" meaning possibly separate points for name/scene and media.
When you are confirming. Keep in mind that you are "vouching" for that answer. So try to confirm the best possible answer. For example, try not to confirm answers that may have the correct name, if the OP is looking for the video.
And also a big THANK YOU to all NTP Contributors! You guys are absolutely essential to the continued growth of this site!
@potro I know you're a gentleman. But may I please ask you to stop confirming the answers before you, where the details are missing. Like name-tags. Because we will accept your comment anyways, because its formatted correctly. PS: Are you a robot? We have soon have to get more people, just to review your comments ^^
And guys, if you get this type of errors:
http://i62.tinypic.com/2q0krh3.jpg
Then either uservoice us, post it here or flag it. Of course, if it is case like this, then flagging it with the url, to such image, would be nice. As some videos may work for others and vice versa.
http://i62.tinypic.com/2q0krh3.jpg
Then either uservoice us, post it here or flag it. Of course, if it is case like this, then flagging it with the url, to such image, would be nice. As some videos may work for others and vice versa.
@T0rtilla it most likely is our spam protection, we have blocked off some spam sites, where the owners came, made a post and answered it right away. Did you use exactly the same content, as you got there now? Or was the original comment with some other link? Can you tell me what link it was, using spaces, so the detector wouldn't pick it up?
I'm having troubles when I try to answer this question:
Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link
I don't know if it's just me or the question has some error and no one can... When I submit my answer it stay saved as long as I am in the page, if I reload or exit, it disappears.
Well, It seems that after a few more attempts, now is solved.
Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link
I don't know if it's just me or the question has some error and no one can... When I submit my answer it stay saved as long as I am in the page, if I reload or exit, it disappears.
Well, It seems that after a few more attempts, now is solved.
#40314
OP
Little note for lower level users..
We usually get alot of flagged posts. And we check them out, wasting alot of time from moderating expense. So we hooked up better system behind, to realize, that most of the flags are made by the original poster. And other flags are basically "that is not the right answer".
So, currently, flagging your own posts is disabled, with little bit more clearer message, when you are flagging. You think your own post is bad, then delete it. Also, we request a reason for flagging from now on. So the flagging should go more valuable and we can actually figure out, which of the posts are bad.
We usually get alot of flagged posts. And we check them out, wasting alot of time from moderating expense. So we hooked up better system behind, to realize, that most of the flags are made by the original poster. And other flags are basically "that is not the right answer".
So, currently, flagging your own posts is disabled, with little bit more clearer message, when you are flagging. You think your own post is bad, then delete it. Also, we request a reason for flagging from now on. So the flagging should go more valuable and we can actually figure out, which of the posts are bad.
#40142
OP
@eagle64 It will be worked out soon.
@Bloodwinter It was originally planned, but problem is, that more features = slow system. So basically, planned in the future, but not a priority right now.
I have also, a plan for a small feature, where you can learn names and faces.
@Bloodwinter It was originally planned, but problem is, that more features = slow system. So basically, planned in the future, but not a priority right now.
I have also, a plan for a small feature, where you can learn names and faces.
An awesome feature, that I've always wanted on sites is to be able to favorite actors/actresses. Be nice once you learn who they are that you could go and favorite them for later reference.
#40009
OP
@eagle64
What would you like your username to be? Put it in bold.
And if you login, and cant, don't forget to try the new username.
What would you like your username to be? Put it in bold.
And if you login, and cant, don't forget to try the new username.
@Operator
yea, genre tags would indeed be usefull for a site where you actually browse for porn,
but dont think it will work for this kind of site.
the search option is good yes, but searching for links dont really work.. or atleast for me O:)
mostly when i put a link i get somewhere in the 10k+ results or 0..
but works fine if i know for example the name of a girl im looking for..
but, why actually does this site need some kind of categorizing system?
its all random pictures/videos from random people,
i dont think its possible to make a more usefull categorizing system for this then what you already have with the pic/gif/video,
and now with the name tags..
yea, genre tags would indeed be usefull for a site where you actually browse for porn,
but dont think it will work for this kind of site.
the search option is good yes, but searching for links dont really work.. or atleast for me O:)
mostly when i put a link i get somewhere in the 10k+ results or 0..
but works fine if i know for example the name of a girl im looking for..
but, why actually does this site need some kind of categorizing system?
its all random pictures/videos from random people,
i dont think its possible to make a more usefull categorizing system for this then what you already have with the pic/gif/video,
and now with the name tags..
#39955
OP
@Legancy
Well, we have image reverse search. Also we were quite surprised, when we started tracking searches. We have had 146.6k searches, less then a month.
http://namethatporn.com/search.html
So I do get your point and I personally was against genres and categories at first. However, this site has evolved from one basic idea to some sort of a regular porn site, with all the porn in it. Also, you can never ever find anything you are looking for. So that is a problem.. However tagging wont help that, very much.
We have big ideas for the future, where there will be separate sites, for browsing porn and asking about porn. Yet, this site needs some sort of a categorizing system. We do not have that solution yet. So all bets are on the table.
Currently, we have duplicate content matching detection. But it will match a exact duplicate of a image or a video url and redirect it to it. Also, we put the search feature on top of the menu list, which seemed to have made the duplicate's less.
We are also collecting anonymous internal search data, so it can be merged and displayed on the search page or maybe even somewhere else. So users who somehow land here, and have some sort of a general question, they can find it from the most searched items list.
Also the image reverse system is first release. We are still tweaking it, so if it would get more reliable, we will mount into posting system. So when we detect, that its the same media and we got an answer for it, user will be redirected to it.
All in all, any idea on how to make the content more accessible to you The Users, we will review all those ideas with top priority.
Well, we have image reverse search. Also we were quite surprised, when we started tracking searches. We have had 146.6k searches, less then a month.
http://namethatporn.com/search.html
So I do get your point and I personally was against genres and categories at first. However, this site has evolved from one basic idea to some sort of a regular porn site, with all the porn in it. Also, you can never ever find anything you are looking for. So that is a problem.. However tagging wont help that, very much.
We have big ideas for the future, where there will be separate sites, for browsing porn and asking about porn. Yet, this site needs some sort of a categorizing system. We do not have that solution yet. So all bets are on the table.
Currently, we have duplicate content matching detection. But it will match a exact duplicate of a image or a video url and redirect it to it. Also, we put the search feature on top of the menu list, which seemed to have made the duplicate's less.
We are also collecting anonymous internal search data, so it can be merged and displayed on the search page or maybe even somewhere else. So users who somehow land here, and have some sort of a general question, they can find it from the most searched items list.
Also the image reverse system is first release. We are still tweaking it, so if it would get more reliable, we will mount into posting system. So when we detect, that its the same media and we got an answer for it, user will be redirected to it.
All in all, any idea on how to make the content more accessible to you The Users, we will review all those ideas with top priority.
Also, is it really a good idea to make tags for genres?
i mean this site is made to search with pictures..
how would wanna search the awnser of a picture through a "teen, big tit/ass, milf" or whatever tag?
imo this is a site find the awnser to picture/videos not the other way around..
dont get me wrong , its not that i think its completly wrong.
but then would everybody also have to use them to make it effective.
just like the "[" who some people specially the anon's mostly forget to use,
they would then ALSO have to put genre tags..
then it would be better to just like our nearly-namecopy who's ofc not gonna get credit by mentioning the name ^^
but to make some kind of rev.image search for this site.
that would then maybe also result in less double posts,
and it would make it sometimes when you see a picture that uve seen before but cant remember the name easier/faster to find it again.
i mean this site is made to search with pictures..
how would wanna search the awnser of a picture through a "teen, big tit/ass, milf" or whatever tag?
imo this is a site find the awnser to picture/videos not the other way around..
dont get me wrong , its not that i think its completly wrong.
but then would everybody also have to use them to make it effective.
just like the "[" who some people specially the anon's mostly forget to use,
they would then ALSO have to put genre tags..
then it would be better to just like our nearly-namecopy who's ofc not gonna get credit by mentioning the name ^^
but to make some kind of rev.image search for this site.
that would then maybe also result in less double posts,
and it would make it sometimes when you see a picture that uve seen before but cant remember the name easier/faster to find it again.
SPONSORED
Other solved questions
