Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.

@Anon_2dMDiLV2xt96Q
I answered you in the other thread but since you asked here as well I will answer.@KeyMasterOfGozer already covered most of it but I wanted to emphasize something you seem to be missing: admins may mark answers as correct in big batches so it's easy to get 10k points in one go if you've been answering questions consistently. So someone may have answered something a month ago but it could get marked correct in a batch with others from all different times making it look like they were all answered in 5 minutes. My answers get marked correct maybe once a week if I'm lucky. Some are still waiting to be marked from months ago. If you tag names and answer questions, they will get marked correct eventually so be patient and keep at it.

@KeyMasterOfGozer
@axelcapo
@Anon_7ajGrqter7MLs

Thanks, I'll try all these tips out :)

If you wants more points go to the older pages, will find alot of repetitive answers that already are mark as correct.
You can use Yandex, Tineye, namethatpornstar reverse image search its more easier.

@Anon_2dMDiLV2xt96Q
For one thing, it is extremely easy to find the 500+ high point posts. One the "Main Menu" to the left, there are links for:

1) "Show Scavenger Hunt" - This is a list of the oldest posts that have not yet been answered. The oldest posts by definition are the highest point ones.

2) "Show Bounty Posts" - This shows the posts that other people have added extra points to. Some of them are many thousands of points.

The Bounty ones are very hard, so I don't waste my time there, but it is easy to scan through the Scavenger hunt ones to find ones that you either know the actress, or the video, or is for some other reason you think you have some info that you can use to do a search and find the answer.

I assure you that all the posts I have made were from research I did. You can look at my activity log. I've definitely found answers to dozens of 500+ questions.

I guess because I posted to this this thread that I had lots of posts not marked correct, the admins must have gone through my list and marked a bunch, because I just got 6000 points from posts that I answered over the last 10 months that have been waiting to be approved.

@KeyMasterOfGozer I'm not saying that their answers aren't correct. I'm saying that it seems shady that they can:

1) locate so many questions that are 500pts or more, because I have only found 7 or 8 in about 4 months.

2) answer those questions so fast and with so much info. A little too much info, if you ask me.

3) get their answers immediately marked correct, when others have questions that are left unmarked for months.

I mean after all, there's a reason why those questions had 500pts to begin with, and that's because they were virtually impossible for anyone to answer for years, and yet somehow these guys can answer 10, 15, or 20 of them in a day like they're nothing? It just all seems very unlikely without some kind of help.

I don't know @Anon_2dMDiLV2xt96Q,

I just looked at@jayrising 's activity log. There is one section that says "12 hours ago" for me. That puts it in the time frame of 2016-12-07 8PM EST. I'm count him getting over 8000 points in that one hour.

You have to remember that you can target questions that give 500+ points for each one. I didn't check all of them, but I spot checked about 10 of the question he answered. All of them looked correct, and most contained Lots of information.

Maybe he is just better than you.

Also, there are many posts that I have answered a few months ago that have still not been marked "correct" yet, so I have not gotten the points for it. It is also possible that the Admins just got around to marking@jayrising 's posts as correct at that time. Maybe his posts were made a long time ago.

That's it, I'm calling shenanigans. How is it possible for someone to rack up 22,000 pts in just 7 days? I spend 2 hours a day answering dozens and dozens of questions, and the most I've ever gotten in a week is 3,375. To make it on the leader boards, I estimate that someone would have to spend over 8 hours a day doing nothing but answering questions on this site, because I simply can't come up with another logical explanation for how that are doing it. Either that, or they have learned some trick to game the system. Does anyone know their secret?

@Don

Why was my thread deleted this time?

Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link
It was simply a thread dedicated to anal sex scenes. Not TS sex scenes, just anal sex scenes, so why was it removed? Are anal scenes banned from this site too? Which they clearly aren't, so it makes no sense me why my thread needed to be removed. It didn't even contain any videos, pics or comments yet, since it was deleted mins after I posted it. I've found plenty of similarly themed threads, so I will now compare my deleted thread which was dedicated to anal porn to other threads that have not been deleted:

Here's one dedicated to cartoon porn, and it has not been deleted:

For Cartoon Porn Lovers

10.5k

25

9

8 years ago

Here's one dedicated to public porn, and it has not been deleted:

For Public Porn Lovers

15.9k

68

19

8 years ago

Here's one dedicated to sleeping porn, and it has not been deleted:

For Sleeping Porn Lovers

14.8k

24

7

8 years ago

Here's one dedicated to cumshots, and it has not be deleted:

Great cumshots

19.2k

51

76

8 years ago

Here's one dedicated to incest porn, which I'm pretty sure is illegal in a lot of places, but yet their thread has not been deleted:

Best Mom Son Taboo Porn Videos

10.8k

16

8

8 years ago

Is it the anal that's getting my thread deleted? Well after doing a bit of searching, I found that there are 2 threads dedicated to anal in some way, and they have not been deleted either:

Who are the best anal loving pornstars?

4,106

3

16

8 years ago

Anal with a story

620

1

0

8 years ago

@Meliodas What do you mean get rid of it? If the link's dead, then just let it be dead.

how do i get rid of following the dead link as other people can see it but not me

Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link

@WorldsBestPorn

I can understand that, but don't you think that sets a very dangerous precedent? Because you admit that none of those individual flags were valid enough to get my thread taken down, but simply because there were many of them from various users, then that means they must have been valid after all?

If there was no basis whatsoever, the thread wouldn't have been removed - no matter the number of flags. You were "on the line" with some of your posts but in a case by case basis the staff decided to turn a blind eye to your attitude, in order to allow the discussion to continue, but at some point it became too much and the staff had to draw the line somewhere.

Thank you. I will attempt to repost my thread simply informing people about your TS policy. It won't contain any violent GIF images, or TS content. I will post the link here in my message just in case it gets removed immediately like the previous 2.

Unfortunately, my request for you to hold that conversation in a respectful manner has apparently fallen on deaf ears. We'll allow it for the time being, but I feel like I have already explained every point raised by you in your thread over and over again in great detail. Why post the same exact thing again instead of revising it with the information that I have given you, if your aim is to "inform people" is beyond me.

Also, at this point, I'd like to ask everyone to take anything related to the subject to the TS thread created by@WorldsBestPorn

Why Are T-Gurl Posts Banned Here? (Discussion)

1,750

1

7

8 years ago

Thank you.

@Don

Thank you for your reply. You've been very helpful on this matter.

"People who originally posted the question can still mark answers correct."

That's a good point, so I apologize for that one. Technically, depending on their level, someone could post banned content, get it answered, and mark it as correct before the post is even flagged, much less removed. However, since the GIF in question had been answered 9 months ago, I assumed that at some point a mod must had at least stumbled upon it and had no problem with it. But I admit that I don't know for sure if that was the case.

"It is true that our moderators didn't find enough basis for a suspension/thread removal when it came to individual flags. But as the complaints from different users over a longer period of time kept coming - in the end it all added up and ultimately lead to the removal of your thread, not just the gif you posted."

I can understand that, but don't you think that sets a very dangerous precedent? Because you admit that none of those individual flags were valid enough to get my thread taken down, but simply because there were many of them from various users, then that means they must have been valid after all? Take a popular Youtube video about Atheism, for example. That video may rack up tons of flags from Christians who want the video taken down, even though it doesn't violate any guidelines. The same can be said about a Christian video getting tons of flags from Atheists. So should the videos be taken down due to the sheer amount of false flags they received? Absolutely not. My thread was controversial to some people, and that's the only reason it received those flags.

"If a discussion is held in a respectful and productive manner, there is absolutely no chance it will get removed by staff members."

I have to respectfully disagree with this, because I was respectful to nearly everyone in my thread. In fact, there were 16 comments in my thread, and 15/16 were in support of allowing TS content. The only one that was negative was the comment that@monohorn mentioned to you earlier. The comment compared TS porn not to only Bestiality (animal sex), but to child porn. In essence, comparing people who enjoy TS porn to pedophiles. That's right, this user compared the act of sex between 2 or more legal, consenting adults to child porn. Is there a "respectful and productive" way to respond to being labeled a supporter of child porn? I don't think so, and I responded to the user in the same manner as anyone would. On a side-note, the reason why I remember this user and his comment so well is because he is consistently in the top 10 leader boards. He has also made many other rude, inciting and disgusting comments like that to me before. I'm not trying to imply his high ranking has gained him favor with the staff, but I do know that I have reported many of his comments in the past, and none were ever taken down. In fact, a few months ago, I was actually suspended for responding to one of his rude, inciting and disgusting comments. I won't mention his name here, but that user is a follower of this thread, so I'm sure he's reading this and knows who he is.

"Again, as long as the thread is respectful towards the site, staff members and other users it will not be removed."

Thank you. I will attempt to repost my thread simply informing people about your TS policy. It won't contain any violent GIF images, or TS content. I will post the link here in my message just in case it gets removed immediately like the previous 2.

Why Are T-Gurl Posts Banned Here? (Discussion)

1,750

1

7

8 years ago

@Don

Got it, appreciate the clarification :)

@monohorn

We plan to add 3 main categories types (Straight/TS/Gay) Where users could set up their preferences when they sign up or in their profile settings - only selected categories will be displayed to the user. In addition, tags or sub-categories will be introduced. So people, can filter through various sub-categories, when looking for content.

We do hope to introduce various new features including content filtering during 2017, unfortunately we can't make any promises when it comes to deadlines since we work on this site in our free time and everyday maintenance takes a big chunk of it.

My question is, if a flag is submitted for "disgusting content", how does the staff evaluate and decide whether the content should be deleted?

It is highly subjective and moderators try to use their best judgement when making these decisions but as I said in my previous comment, no single flag/complaint was the deciding factor for the thread removal. It was the collection of flags received during a lengthy period of time, by a number of different users - with most of them addressing their concern/dislike over the OP's general behavior and hostile tone. If a discussion is held in a respectful and productive manner, there is absolutely no chance it will get removed by staff members.

I voiced my support for allowing TS content in @WorldsBestPorn's thread, but since it has been deleted I suppose that's a moot point.

Going forward, though, I do have 2 questions that I hope@Don can help clarify:

- You mentioned adding specific niches. This looks like an awesome feature, makes everything much easier to search. Is there any concrete plan/timeline for this, or is it something that isn't on the cards right now?

- You mentioned that one of the flags submitted for the deleted thread was:
"Posting disgusting things to prove a point please remove".

Unlike the rest about rudeness/hostility, this is extremely subjective. In this case, the nature of TS porn was enough to get some people offended; I remember one response in the deleted thread comparing TS content to beastality. I'm pretty sure that scat content or pics with captions suggesting incest will invoke similar feelings of disgust.

My question is, if a flag is submitted for "disgusting content", how does the staff evaluate and decide whether the content should be deleted?

@KeyMasterOfGozer

"Somehow when a penis is attached to a woman's body that is somehow SUPER offensive to the staff. That doesn't make any sense."

I just want to make it very clear here: The staff is not against TS content, in fact we agree that it should be allowed on our site. But it has to be done the right way, slamming everything together unfortunately does not work - this is not an 'opinion', but experience, we tried it.

When we first launched, we originally allowed everything that qualifies under the word 'porn' - but it came evident rather quickly that solution won't work. So we decided to go with the mainstream type of porn initially and add specific niches later on.

EDIT: The situation you described should indeed be considered as a special case and be allowed on the site. We'll try to review each case separately, unfortunately when it comes to reviewing thousands of posts daily, occasionally mistakes do happen.

@WorldsBestPorn

"Clearly, if a mod views the content, and marks it as correct without deleting it, then it is allowed on this site. Which means my GIF was also allowed."

Wrong. People who originally posted the question can still mark answers correct. Until a couple months ago, they could do so without any level limitations, even anonymous users, since the process was session based and not limited to a user account. In addition to that, auto-confirming was allowed in the past as well - meaning if a post received a certain number of confirms it was automatically marked as correct.

Aren't those suspendable offenses? Surely, had I posted hostile, insulting or rude comments to someone in my thread, then I would have been suspended for them, correct? But I wasn't, so that proves my comments were nothing like that, and that those flags were just people lying to get the thread taken down. And besides, as you stated earlier, the reason why it was taken down was due to an "violent/inappropriate" GIF, not any of their comment flags, which proves they were false anyway.

It is true that our moderators didn't find enough basis for a suspension/thread removal when it came to individual flags. But as the complaints from different users over a longer period of time kept coming - in the end it all added up and ultimately lead to the removal of your thread, not just the gif you posted.

I would love to, but I just explained that I uploaded 2 threads which were similar to my original one. Neither contained violent or even she-male images, and yet both were deleted in seconds.

Again, as long as the thread is respectful towards the site, staff members and other users it will not be removed.

I gotta side with@WorldsBestPorn here

@Don

Thank you for your reply. Let me respond to each individual allegation, because there were a lot of them made in your response:

"Posts containing extreme violence are not allowed, just because they have been posted on the site does not mean they are allowed"

I posted no such content. Like I said before, I posted a GIF of a woman being slapped, which was from an already answered post on this site. Clearly, if a mod views the content, and marks it as correct without deleting it, then it is allowed on this site. Which means my GIF was also allowed.

"Here are just some of the flags our users have submitted for your thread:

-Instigating hostility
-insulting others
-rude

Aren't those suspendable offenses? Surely, had I posted hostile, insulting or rude comments to someone in my thread, then I would have been suspended for them, correct? But I wasn't, so that proves my comments were nothing like that, and that those flags were just people lying to get the thread taken down. And besides, as you stated earlier, the reason why it was taken down was due to an "violent/inappropriate" GIF, not any of their comment flags, which proves they were false anyway.

-its not helpful discussion but him telling everyone else what he wants and everyone who disagrees gets downvoted or rude comments.

That flag is another lie. My thread never said I "wanted" anything. It simply asked the question if she-male porn should be allowed. And I have no control over people who don't support she-male porn being on this site being downvoted by someone who does, so how is that a valid flag? For example, I can't flag a thread dedicated to overweight blond women because I don't think it's necessary, or because people in the thread say mean things to me, or vote my comment down.

-posting comment then deleting it to bump his thread

I never did that, and more importantly, there would be no way for them to even know if I did, so how is that a valid flag?

"As for me personally, I just don't see the necessity for the thread. Since staff has already made it's decision regarding the issue and explained it's position on the matter."

It's necessary because at no point have you publicly stated your position on the matter. The only people who knew about it are people who follow this thread, or people who followed mines, which obviously is the overwhelming minority of the users on this site. That's why she-male posts are still continuously posted here.

"But if you feel there's something more to that needs to be discussed on the matter, feel free to make a new thread, as long as it's respectful towards the site, staff members and other users - it will not be removed."

I would love to, but I just explained that I uploaded 2 threads which were similar to my original one. Neither contained violent or even she-male images, and yet both were deleted in seconds. I still haven't received a reason why they were deleted, so I have no clue what to do differently to ensure that they won't be.