Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.

I have a video who i would see but i can't find her or copy the url link she is already on this site but i can't found her she is too deep in the history wich name is teen anime chick jerks dick
if you can help me. ty

@Operator @Don I'm not sure, but I think there maybe a glitch happening. Several times this week, I would answer a post that contained a video, but then moments later it would say "video not found". Normally, that would mean the video was deleted, but when I clicked the "source" button, the video played just fine. Is it an embedding issue? Has anyone else experienced this? :/ Here's a prime example right here...

What's the name of this porn star?

448

2

1

8 years ago

Answered

.
For the record, in response to NinNin's Post #52424714 two posts below, where he felt an incorrect inference was made about what sounded like a "general rule," his own words (from #523539 of mentioned thread linked ten posts below) read as follows:

"In response to@Know-way , in the staff thread (#481872)@Don clarifies that answers to "Where can I find video" questions need only 'playable media' to get marked as correct."

That indeed sounds like media of any length would be the general rule.

.

Ok, let me ask it myself. Does anybody detect anything wrong on the site while using a mobile phone?

Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link

@Know-way

You're putting words in my mouth and you're making an incorrect inference. I did not, as you say, present@Don 's line--"a short clip would be sufficient"--as a "general rule" when answering questions about videos, nor do I support it as such. I'm not going to comment further on the post that started this discussion as I feel I've said all that I needed to say.

@KeyMasterOfGozer

I think you misunderstood my views on anons. I'm not saying that they should be punished by only receiving partial answers, because I always try to find the full video to every post that I answer, even when the post is only asking for the name. What I'm saying is that when only a partial video can be found for an anon's post, then there is no reason why it shouldn't be accepted as correct. Users have the ability to accept answers as correct for a reason, and it's because it gives the user the power to decide if an answer meets their standard or not. That's the benefit of being an actual member of this community, and not an anon just passing through.

For example, a while ago, I posted a GIF of a girl receiving a huge facial and asked for the video. Someone posted only a 5min clip, but the clip contained the facial that I wanted, so I accepted it as correct. If partial videos are no longer allowed, then that correct answer would have sat their for who knows how long, and having open posts like that doesn't benefit this community at all. And if someone comes to that post later on and gets upset that the full video wasn't posted, then they can simply repost it themselves and ask for the full video.

@WorldsBestPorn respectfully, I have to disagree. I guess I'm not here for the points per se, instead I think of this as a database where people including myself can search for answers. It shouldn't matter if the OP is anon or a user, this is for the greater good, and all who may search later, not just the OP. If you are going to do the job, you might as well do it right.

One should always try to provide the full video if possible, and only if after a very thorough search, you can't find it, the a partial, and label it as such. If the OP is asking for a video, and you post a partial, then someone comes after an posts the Full, the one who answered the question more correctly should get the credit.

Of course, I would not be opposed to being able to give an "Assist" to previous posters, so you can share the points. That would promote camaraderie, and encourage people to post partial answers if they know them to help someone else "get it into the goal".

@Know-way

I have to side with@NinNin on this for one reason. You have to understand that some posts are 1-2 years old, and are usually asked by anons, which mean they have no ability to accept answers. This also means that someone can spend hours trying to find a full version of a video, (even though a full video wasn't even asked for), for an anon who can't even reward you for all that hard work, and probably doesn't even care about it anymore, since they didn't even care enough to take the time in order to make an account. So I myself only try to find the full video for users with accounts. I reward them for taking the time to make an account by posting the full video for them, and they in turn reward me for taking the time to find the full video by accepting my answer. We both benefit in that case, so anon OPs should basically just take whatever we can find, even if it's a short clip.

.
If Don wrote that "a short clip would be sufficient" line in cases where nothing better is available, then he was exactly in tune with where I have been coming from. But you presented that line as a general rule, and indeed, the way it was phrased in Don's response (to you) comes across as the rule.

Remember, the hubbub was in regard to a user getting the credit for a partial video, when someone else later came up with the full video. (The first user then apparently took the full video link presented later, and altered his initial reply in an "EDIT," without acknowledging the second user... which did not sit well with me.)

You made the point the first user was not in the wrong, as I argued he was, because we are allowed to provide short clips in our responses to "Where can I find this video" questions. To substantiate your position, you pointed to Don's "A short clip would be sufficient" line as the general rule. Now you seem to be saying otherwise, that Don only meant what he wrote in special cases (which, again, I would be in full agreement with. But... is that what Don meant? Let's tune in and see).

You are now at a mind-blowing "Level 92,"@NinNin , and you have already mentioned in the other thread (or "post," as they like to say around here) that you provide full-lengthers anyway. You seem to have been doing a great job so far, and I do not think you need to worry about additional stress. If Don and/or the Operator make clear we are supposed to provide full videos, but short ones will be okay in special cases, then the situation will be exactly as I have always thought it was... and that you apparently now think it is. Nothing will have changed for you, or for the rest of "us" puzzle-solvers.
.

@Know-way In fairness,@Don said "a short clip would be sufficient" in cases where nothing better is available. His words should not be used to clear the way for "any piece of crap video excerpt".

(@Jimmmy , an "Openload" solution could be to provide the link in two separate lines, and add the note to please combine both lines.)

Hello,@Don ! (And dear@Operator .) How are you? It has been a long time.

Reason why I am squawking now is related to the commotion taking place at:

Where can I find this video?

1,654

3

2

10 years ago

Answered

In response, valued member@NinNin has brought to my attention a stipulation that Don wrote in Post #4818722 below, two months ago.

I was troubled by Don's line, " Note: A short clip would be sufficient", in response to "Where can I find this video?" questions.

As I have known, we do not provide partial clips, nor do we provide torrent links (because not everyone can do torrents), except in the rare cases where a movie is so unattainable, we have no other choice. ("Better than nothing.")

The decision is always up to the moderator to issue an approval or not, and it is the prerogative of the moderator to do so for whatever reason; that cannot be argued with, as Don has made clear with his ending line. (The OP's can always mark the questions solved regardless of the information provided.)

But we cannot accept partial clips as a rule. That would defeat the purpose, and I humbly request that this is made clear to all.

I see we have a lot more helpers, and they have been doing amazing work. It is astounding how so many have penetrated the "Level 100" mark, which was unthinkable "back in the day." With that, there come those who are "score crazy," and may engage in underhanded tactics. Can we imagine how those who are scruples-challenged may go about providing any piece of crap video excerpt... and then confidently point to the rule, as it now stands, " Note: A short clip would be sufficient"?

No one who asks for a video would desire anything less than the full video (without their needing to specify with the word "Full"), and that should be the general rule. (Otherwise... chaos shall ensue!)

.

Hey, why can't we post openload links anymore?

@Operator and@Don Hey guys, I seem to be having an issue at the login screen. I haven't been able to log into my account at all since yesterday. What's the problem? Thanks for your time :)

Do you support, or will, tumbkr posts ?

There he goes again with his crappy music, and pathetic grammar

What's the name of this porn star?

370

4

1

8 years ago

Answered

@wordbox

The guy trying to promote his music is @Fatass_lover. As you can see here, his account has already been permanently banned for spam:

http://namethatporn.com/user/fatass_lover.html

But that didn't stop him. Now he just does it as an anon, so that's yet another reason why this site should consider forcing every user to register.

Some guy trying to promote his music

What's the name of this porn star?

535

3

1

8 years ago

Answered

hi there

another spammer is using the site, example of his posts:
Auto.msg.: ntp.so/ - dead link

Full video?

450

0

1

8 years ago

Answered

Question:

If I discover that a user is posting multiple questions as an anon, (around 10 in a row), and then using his account to answer them seconds later just to gain points, then should that user be reported?