Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.

@Operator

Another spammer@mommyincestsis

This anonymous complaining has to stop. If you can't say it under your name, don't say it at all.

We JUST started the new moderation wave as a trial. I will not go into details here, as it is not even a week old.

Start an action panel access, was open to anyone. The ones, who did email me, participated in a beta testing of generating example data. The system is not hooked to anything yet and serves no function. If you did not bother to help the community, with beta testing then don't complain about not getting the access. -- These users, will at one point get some sort of reward for helping, but have not gotten anything special as of yet.

It is obvious, that if there are alot of pending answers, then there is gonna be a change in the statistics. Points are counted in as of date moderated, not the date answered. Its always been like this.

@Anon_b2BHOO2WQeyEM My point is, say I have 3,000 thousand questions waiting to be marked correct and you have 300. If 10 percent of all users' answers were moderated, then I would surely have more correct answers than you, as well as more points. The only hierarchy here is that the users who regularly appear in the top 10 generally answer the most questions, and that's why the user currently sitting at number three will probably end the month at number one.

@Anon_885X3UiIvED62 If you honestly have thousands of answers waiting to be marked correct, then wouldn't that make you one of the most "active users"? Then where's your points? Clearly there is a hierarchy happening here, and that not fair if we are all supposed to be "in the same boat".

Do you know why the same users are consistently in the top 10? Because they are the most active users, not just in answering questions. Many of those users also confirm, confirm, confirm. It is clear that there is some moderation right now. Wouldn't it then follow that the most active users would receive the most moderation. For example, while some users are complaining about having hundreds of answers waiting to be marked correct, I have thousands! I appreciate the frustration of users as expressed below. But as long as I see improvement in the site, which I have recently, including some moderation, I feel encouraged.

@Anon_b2BHOO2WQeyEM YES! That's exactly what I was talking about the other day. I'm glad somebody finally sees things from my perspective, thank you. I don't think it's a coincidence that the same users are consistently on the top 10 list for the month. Especially the one who's currently at number 3. I'd bet my life he's number 1 at the end of the month just like he is EVERY month. They've all had to've figured out a way to rig the system in their favor and to me that's total bullshit and I don't see any point in contributing to this site anymore if that's how things are going to be.

@Operator Yes, I've had a couple of anon moderated points awarded in the past 9 months, while other users have had thousands of anon moderated points awarded to them in the past 12 hours. That sounds perfectly fair...

I'm complaining about the fact that you have been telling us that we were all in the same boat, meaning moderation was halted for everyone equally, and this is clearly not true. Some users clearly know how to access this "Start an Action" tab in order to get their anon answers accepted quickly, while the rest of us common folk are forced to just wonder and guess how to get our anon answers accepted. Why don't you tell us all how to "Start an Action" on anon posts? That's only fair.

@Anon_b2BHOO2WQeyEM we are trying out moderation on some level, it is too early to talk about this. I can see from the logs you have been moderated as well. So this is what everybody wanted, including you, why are you complaining about it?

For the others, because there is unhelpful confirm event now, then we can collect data on users confirm rates. This could possibly mean, that answers with multiple confirms from high rate users can output an accept. Of course this is just an idea as of yet, but its very positive news, that we have this new option now.

@Operator Now I'm stating to agree that everyone isn't in the same boat when it comes to who gets points, as Anon_d9c.FFLwPMtPg suggested earlier. You just said a few days ago that "no one is being moderated at the moment", and yet I see users getting thousands of points awarded to them from anon's just like in the old days of moderation. How is that possible without moderation? How is it fair that some select users can get awarded points from anons, but others cannot? How is that fair to the community? How are we "all in the same boat" if most users can only be awarded for a fraction of their answers, but others can be awarded for all of their answers? If this has something to do with the review pool, then why don't we all have access to it? Why launch a tool that only some users can even benefit from?

@Operator

@tit55 is spamming.

@dub I fixed it for now. I will further optimise it today.

@Operator Megawall https://namethatporn.com/megawall is down, isn't it?

@NinNin Thanks for catching that. We upgraded into another cache system yesterday and there was one important syntax change, which was iffy if there will be any errors. So it is very very good, that you found that actually!

@Operator There seems to be a problem with the search function. When I search for a porn star, results will show, but when I click on any of them, nothing but an empty page shows.

@L1bru5 that is a good question. There are multiple ways. For an old answer to pop up in the review panel, lets say it needs some confirms. Or someone starts an action on it.

Here is a screenshot of the in-site "start an action" panel. It is the first initial one, so nothing is rock solid. And most probably, not all users can simply start these actions.
But general idea is, that based on specific levels users can start up actions. And then from review panel, other users can vote on those. So lets say Ninnin starts a vote on your 2 year old answer, and other users will vote yes. Confirming that they have verified the source of the answer and names and etc.

@Operator - I am meaning for the really old questions where OP is either not accepting, no longer visiting this site, or was an anon.

This new system is (or will be) in place for the community, how do go about getting these old ones accepted? is it a certain number of confirms? Like for example, 5 people confirm an answer... is it flagged or something? or automatically marked as correct...?

I have close to 450 pending answers so I was wondering what can I do? (if anything)

@bergersnfrys Yes you can in theory change username. But you need to contact us privately, not in a public forum.

@bebunw That is not a solution. Solution is community moderating, which I mention in absolutely every reply here. Scroll down and read what is going on.
Level 4 you can edit and delete your stuff.

@L1bru5 I don't understand the question. If the OP is level 1, then the answer needs 1 confirm. Otherwise there is no minimal requirement.

I mean in the bounty section not the scavenger, at which level are we able to edit a post ?

Block user function: we block a user who never answer back to confirm for each of his question so his questions never happen again to me on all the website, that way i can also prevent very old questions who got answered by the community with all the proof like the first one in scavenger hunt section and laying there for 3 years