
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
This is an "ask other users for help" thread. This is the fastest place for common questions about the site. DO NOT ask porn-related questions here!
For image host use or or another adult friendly site, read TOS to ensure site hosts adult content.
If you need to ask the staff then check:
If you're a newbie with questions, read this thread first:
For image host use or or another adult friendly site, read TOS to ensure site hosts adult content.
If you need to ask the staff then check:
Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
159.5k
136
4,369
12 years ago
If you're a newbie with questions, read this thread first:
The ultimate noob guide
43.8k
80
11
7 years ago
111k
70
2,213
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
Is there a way to search for a post by its number?
Was looking to confirm this post
has a link to a picture from post 1208152 in text form not the actual picture.
The linked picture is definitely related IMHO, but would like to see it in context.
Was looking to confirm this post
Name and COMPLETE Info ?
2,206
2
1
6 years ago
AnsweredThe linked picture is definitely related IMHO, but would like to see it in context.
@freddyssecret @aglinua In the past, accounts that use link shorteners have been banned. This person is clearly spamming.
@freddyssecret It's certainly annoying enough and the answers aren't good enough for me to ever consider confirming him. I think he will learn that if he plays dumb games he won't get annything
Is monetizing your proof links tolerated?
There's a user that keeps posting low effort answers with proof links that seem to be monetized through an adf.ly type program. I can't even check the proof because I refuse to disable Pi-hole to use these links.
I don't think this should be tolerated as it slows down confirming and generally is a nuisance just to make a few cents. I already flagged this stuff a couple times but nothing has happened so far.
I'm aware that there's no rule against this but I think its unethical to a point where it should be punished.
What do y'all think?
https://namethatporn.com/user/Fisher123.html
There's a user that keeps posting low effort answers with proof links that seem to be monetized through an adf.ly type program. I can't even check the proof because I refuse to disable Pi-hole to use these links.
I don't think this should be tolerated as it slows down confirming and generally is a nuisance just to make a few cents. I already flagged this stuff a couple times but nothing has happened so far.
I'm aware that there's no rule against this but I think its unethical to a point where it should be punished.
What do y'all think?
https://namethatporn.com/user/Fisher123.html
@aglinua I agree with@herkalurk . Confirm the first valid correct answer. That is an answer with tags and supporting links. The answer has to be pretty obvious for me to confirm without links.
Some users think it's fine to post their own answer on top of a perfectly valid one if it hasn't been accepted after some time. It's not. They will say the answer is lacking because it hasn't received confirms. That's BS. There are many answers waiting for confirms, even years later, especially from lower level users who need more confirms for their answers to be accepted.
You are penalized only when you confirm an answer (if it's reviewed by a mod) that lacks tags or proof, doesn't answer the question completely or is wrong.
Some users think it's fine to post their own answer on top of a perfectly valid one if it hasn't been accepted after some time. It's not. They will say the answer is lacking because it hasn't received confirms. That's BS. There are many answers waiting for confirms, even years later, especially from lower level users who need more confirms for their answers to be accepted.
You are penalized only when you confirm an answer (if it's reviewed by a mod) that lacks tags or proof, doesn't answer the question completely or is wrong.
If you find a post that already has a valid answer in your opinion, then confirm it yourself. I know that I'm not the only one in this boat where I answered something years ago but it never got confirmed. I've started going to my oldest comments and adding them to the confirm thread to get those answers closed. The ultimate goal of this site is to get as many things answered correctly, so the more you confirm or answer yourself, the closer we are to that goal.
Sorry, it seems I'm the only one who's been spamming questions recently but I wanted to know what the etiquette on "stealing/tweaking" answers is?
Like I'm cool with doing an answer if the original is wrong, tagged wrong, lacks information etc. But what about old ones that are correct and never got confirmed/marked correct?
I've seen a lot of recent answers that just add a bit of new information (like official/trusted source links) and they get confirmed by good, high level answerers.
My principles don't like that but I also don't want to confirm the original answer since I will get a bad record. Is taking someone else's answer acceptable?
I can kind of justify it since it will get accepted and be added to the database which is good, but like it just sucks that the original answerer didn't get credit.
(Edit: Actually I am unsure; does confirming the answer that doesn't end up being selected count against your confirm/answer record or does it only count against if you confirm something that ends up overturned because it was incorrect?)
Like I'm cool with doing an answer if the original is wrong, tagged wrong, lacks information etc. But what about old ones that are correct and never got confirmed/marked correct?
I've seen a lot of recent answers that just add a bit of new information (like official/trusted source links) and they get confirmed by good, high level answerers.
My principles don't like that but I also don't want to confirm the original answer since I will get a bad record. Is taking someone else's answer acceptable?
I can kind of justify it since it will get accepted and be added to the database which is good, but like it just sucks that the original answerer didn't get credit.
(Edit: Actually I am unsure; does confirming the answer that doesn't end up being selected count against your confirm/answer record or does it only count against if you confirm something that ends up overturned because it was incorrect?)
What is the post limit per day? I think I may have hit it? Around 20? Or do I just have bad wifi, because I get infinite loading when trying to post more answers
Inappropriate comments/content are flagworthy, for example, underage content, hateful language. But it seems to take a long time for flagged posts to be addressed or removed, if they are at all. If it's an urgent issue, you can try posting on the Staff thread.
There are a lot of terrible answers on this site, but WRONG answers only can be posted here:
There are a lot of terrible answers on this site, but WRONG answers only can be posted here:
CLOSED - Report a SOLVED question with the WRONG Answer HERE!
40.4k
33
1,046
6 years ago
flagging is for like something in the wrong place, or hate stuff like you said, people post bad answers all the time, this is why you confirm only good answers then the automated system will chose that. Most of my flags come from things in the straight section that are trans, or gay, so that hopefully the mods will move it to the right section when they see it. The other thing would be if you know something is clearly underage or illegal content.
What counts as "flag-worthy?" for example, if someone posts a blatantly unrelated answer? Or only if it's hateful?
What do we do if we're not supposed to flag terrible answers?
What do we do if we're not supposed to flag terrible answers?
Is there a good way to contact users with a lot of points to get your answers confirmed or at least looked at as a Level 1 user?
@herkalurk What I thought. Was confirming answers. User asked for video. Was given a Premium download link in answer. :(
@johnnyb645 when user is asking for video, it's generally assumed they want a free source like pornhub, xhamster, xvideos, daftsex, etc.
Does a "premium/paid account required" source suffice if someone asks for a video? I'm leaning heavily towards no.
I want to write a link because I could not upload a photo, but the link is too long what should ı do?
SPONSORED
Other solved questions
