
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
This is an "ask other users for help" thread. This is the fastest place for common questions about the site. DO NOT ask porn-related questions here!
For image host use or or another adult friendly site, read TOS to ensure site hosts adult content.
If you need to ask the staff then check:
If you're a newbie with questions, read this thread first:
For image host use or or another adult friendly site, read TOS to ensure site hosts adult content.
If you need to ask the staff then check:
Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
159.5k
136
4,369
12 years ago
If you're a newbie with questions, read this thread first:
The ultimate noob guide
43.8k
80
11
7 years ago
111k
70
2,213
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
@Lmaooooo1 Sorry, I thought you were trying to post a video. Try an image host like https://imgur.com/
@NinNin So how would I go about this task in say PH. I uploaded the picture in an album, but I could not find a link that has the image file after the url...
@Lmaooooo1 I don't believe this site supports motherless. Try pornhub or xvideos.
I need help on how to make a post using a url. I tried uploading an image to “motherless.com” but when I tried to use the link, it said the image was “too small”.
Can someone recommend a way to me.
Can someone recommend a way to me.
@mixedracedude22
Unanswered questions gain 1 point of bounty for every day they stay unsolved, so solving a 6 year old question will award 2000+ points. You can stack up lots of points if you solve old questions consistently.
Having points grants you privileges on the platform, like editing and deleting answers or the ability to confirm other users' answers.
Beyond level 5, points are worthless unless you see a prestige value in them.
Unanswered questions gain 1 point of bounty for every day they stay unsolved, so solving a 6 year old question will award 2000+ points. You can stack up lots of points if you solve old questions consistently.
Having points grants you privileges on the platform, like editing and deleting answers or the ability to confirm other users' answers.
Beyond level 5, points are worthless unless you see a prestige value in them.
Why do people have so many points and what's the point of having them?
@freddyssecret
That's a very valid concern. When examples like yours are brought up on the staff thread,@Operator will say, well, OP accepted it, the point being it's OP's question after all.
To me, it's a lot to expect for new users to understand the point of tagging. By level 3 or 4, I feel they should know how the site works. But I recommend more patience when it comes to a large bounty question because it may have been the first question they answered. If the answer is tagged but incomplete (for example, if the question asks for a name and video, but only one is given), then I think it’s fair to post your own answer.
That's a very valid concern. When examples like yours are brought up on the staff thread,@Operator will say, well, OP accepted it, the point being it's OP's question after all.
To me, it's a lot to expect for new users to understand the point of tagging. By level 3 or 4, I feel they should know how the site works. But I recommend more patience when it comes to a large bounty question because it may have been the first question they answered. If the answer is tagged but incomplete (for example, if the question asks for a name and video, but only one is given), then I think it’s fair to post your own answer.
@NinNin
That's a good point. I actually didn't think about that specific one twice but now that you brought it up I'll put more effort into checking profiles when reanswering.
I was mostly thinking about few-days-old posts, e.g. this one:
When I typed out the first post about this, I thought stealing recent answers might be a possibility to intercept low quality OP confirms but in hindsight that idea is pretty terrible, especially now that I type it out like this.
Is there a way to get these corrected after they've been marked as solved? I feel like these should be fixed to make best use of the tagging system but they don't feel "wrong enough" for the Wrong Answer thread.
That's a good point. I actually didn't think about that specific one twice but now that you brought it up I'll put more effort into checking profiles when reanswering.
I was mostly thinking about few-days-old posts, e.g. this one:
Looking for full video and name
451
1
2
6 years ago
AnsweredWhen I typed out the first post about this, I thought stealing recent answers might be a possibility to intercept low quality OP confirms but in hindsight that idea is pretty terrible, especially now that I type it out like this.
Is there a way to get these corrected after they've been marked as solved? I feel like these should be fixed to make best use of the tagging system but they don't feel "wrong enough" for the Wrong Answer thread.
@freddyssecret
You may be referring to one of your own posts. I bring it up not to be critical, but because it's a good example.
To me, this one is borderline.@notausernamereally is correct, but the answer is not valid for lack of tags, as well as proof. However, it's worth a lot of points and the user was active about two weeks ago.
To be fair, I would try to help this user improve their answer in a post and wait for a response. If there is none after a reasonable amount of time, then at least you can say you tried. Other users will see that when you post your own answer.
If you (hypothetically) post your answer on the confirm thread before then, well, that's a little bit more like stealing.
You may be referring to one of your own posts. I bring it up not to be critical, but because it's a good example.
Artist or full vids ?
3,751
12
2
9 years ago
AnsweredTo me, this one is borderline.@notausernamereally is correct, but the answer is not valid for lack of tags, as well as proof. However, it's worth a lot of points and the user was active about two weeks ago.
To be fair, I would try to help this user improve their answer in a post and wait for a response. If there is none after a reasonable amount of time, then at least you can say you tried. Other users will see that when you post your own answer.
If you (hypothetically) post your answer on the confirm thread before then, well, that's a little bit more like stealing.
@herkalurk Thank you for your feedback.
@ Hidden User: This was a hypothetical question which I asked because I wanted to know how the community feels about handling recent low quality answers by (mostly) low level users.
This isn't about blame but about me aligning with the community, as I am a new user myself.
@ Hidden User: This was a hypothetical question which I asked because I wanted to know how the community feels about handling recent low quality answers by (mostly) low level users.
This isn't about blame but about me aligning with the community, as I am a new user myself.
@freddyssecret if they're brand new like less than a few hundred points, I usually tell them how to format better and include the link. I'm not worried about points and not going to steal a front page answer from a new user. If you come accross a 1K point question that has a badly formatted answer from a newer user, look at how long it was posted and also if that user is even active. Sometimes the new user posted an answer close to when the question was asked, and never came back. I wouldn't feel guilty about stealing anything from someone who clearly doesn't care enough to login after a year or 2.
What do you guys think about immediately "stealing" a new user's (recent) answer that doesn't have proper syntax (mostly missing name tags)?
Previously, I've posted a comment and asked them to repost their answer with proper syntax and also linking to the answering guidelines. However, 20% or less of the people I have addressed like this have actually fixed their answer and following up with each post like this is a nuisance.
This leads to lots of threads being closed with improperly formatted answers and to 1k+ pts threads that could have been closed 2 days after the question was posted.
This brings us to my dilemma: is it okay to just steal new users' recent answers and improving them up to standard while risking to lose new users or should one help the new users, risking worse "quality of service"? What's your opinion?
Previously, I've posted a comment and asked them to repost their answer with proper syntax and also linking to the answering guidelines. However, 20% or less of the people I have addressed like this have actually fixed their answer and following up with each post like this is a nuisance.
This leads to lots of threads being closed with improperly formatted answers and to 1k+ pts threads that could have been closed 2 days after the question was posted.
This brings us to my dilemma: is it okay to just steal new users' recent answers and improving them up to standard while risking to lose new users or should one help the new users, risking worse "quality of service"? What's your opinion?
@Katflying37
The first post by@MrSonderbar is not valid as an answer as@herkalurk points out. If it was, I would've confirmed it.
But how is my answer different? After all, it doesn't provide the video in OP's screencap either. To echo@Odetomaybe questions asking for a specific video of a cam model is often not a reasonable request. Most OPs don't seem to realize this.
First we have to assume that there's a video to begin with. It's much easier to make a capture of a cam show than it is to record a video. In the case of Orayoung, she's been camming for over five years. On one site I referred to, she has over 1800 videos.
There are at least 10 websites I use to find cam recordings. You can find them on my profile page. I include all meaningful search results in my answers. Using this many sources is often not necessary, but I prefer to be thorough when answering a question with a considerable bounty.
For this answer, six sites returned a significant number of videos. I went through five of the six sites searching for OP's video. The one with 1800 results over 166 pages I decided to skip. I looked through hundreds of videos. I didn't mind too much, she is gorgeous. In the end, I thought including "similar" videos in which she's wearing the same socks or a similar sweater was sufficent. I did not have a lot of visual info to start. Past answers of mine have been accepted with as much info and I would not hesitate to confirm a similar answer from a user I know to be thorough.
The first post by@MrSonderbar is not valid as an answer as@herkalurk points out. If it was, I would've confirmed it.
But how is my answer different? After all, it doesn't provide the video in OP's screencap either. To echo@Odetomaybe questions asking for a specific video of a cam model is often not a reasonable request. Most OPs don't seem to realize this.
First we have to assume that there's a video to begin with. It's much easier to make a capture of a cam show than it is to record a video. In the case of Orayoung, she's been camming for over five years. On one site I referred to, she has over 1800 videos.
There are at least 10 websites I use to find cam recordings. You can find them on my profile page. I include all meaningful search results in my answers. Using this many sources is often not necessary, but I prefer to be thorough when answering a question with a considerable bounty.
For this answer, six sites returned a significant number of videos. I went through five of the six sites searching for OP's video. The one with 1800 results over 166 pages I decided to skip. I looked through hundreds of videos. I didn't mind too much, she is gorgeous. In the end, I thought including "similar" videos in which she's wearing the same socks or a similar sweater was sufficent. I did not have a lot of visual info to start. Past answers of mine have been accepted with as much info and I would not hesitate to confirm a similar answer from a user I know to be thorough.
@aglinua
I generally consider the tags of those sites as trustworthy. I'll only check twice if the artist has been tagged less than 50 times. Sankaku is a bit more annoying as you have to login to see the source link.
I generally consider the tags of those sites as trustworthy. I'll only check twice if the artist has been tagged less than 50 times. Sankaku is a bit more annoying as you have to login to see the source link.
No question but a little helper for reverse image searching video posts. I thought some of you might find it useful, too.
I wrote a little JavaScript snippet you can save as a bookmark which will open a new tab with the post's thumbnail.
Simply add a new bookmark and paste this as the URL:
javascript:window.open(document.querySelector("meta[property='og:image']").getAttribute('content'));
If you immediately want to search with Yandex's image reverse search, bookmark this:
javascript:window.open("https://yandex.com/images/search?rpt=imageview&img_url=" + encodeURIComponent(document.querySelector("meta[property='og:image']").getAttribute('content')));
It works on Internet Explorer so I guess it should work everywhere. There are a couple (old) posts that don't have thumbnails, those will open an empty tab so be aware of that.
I wrote a little JavaScript snippet you can save as a bookmark which will open a new tab with the post's thumbnail.
Simply add a new bookmark and paste this as the URL:
javascript:window.open(document.querySelector("meta[property='og:image']").getAttribute('content'));
If you immediately want to search with Yandex's image reverse search, bookmark this:
javascript:window.open("https://yandex.com/images/search?rpt=imageview&img_url=" + encodeURIComponent(document.querySelector("meta[property='og:image']").getAttribute('content')));
It works on Internet Explorer so I guess it should work everywhere. There are a couple (old) posts that don't have thumbnails, those will open an empty tab so be aware of that.
What criteria should be used to determine whether or not an artist made a piece? Is r34/sankaku link enough, given the artist is tagged there? Not all artists have twitter sites and such.
@Katflying37 the example you've provided the user that posted the first answer didn't include a video, therefore it's not a valid answer to the question. I do see that NinNin didn't single out which video link is supposed to be the video in question, but don't act like the first answer was good.
@NinNin ... what happened with: "confirm the first valid answer" from your post below??, maybe it is not so f*cking obvious to you when it comes a bunch of points in the middle, what a two-faces dude..., I don't blame you if you're trying to get the points by putting a new answer in top of an old one, but at least get the right video!... and stop trying to discourage the enthusiast people to improve answers to close ancient posts with that argue of doing BS...c'mon your are doing that all the time...
SPONSORED
Other solved questions
