Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.

The gifs on request pages aren't loading on my iPhone. Dunno if it is your end or mine.

@dub it should currently index the first frame.

Thanks for the answer! I don't really know, but couldn't it maybe index just the first (or middle) frame? It would be far from perfect, but it would at least allow us to find some of the previous posts for them. Thanks anyway!

Hello@dub as of right now, there is no direct plans for imagreverse, but the setup will be looked into. I cant promise if GIF will be ever reverseable, as each gif frame should be indexed.. Maybe. But GIF will get a update to be more faster.

Hi @Operator, are there any plans for ImageReverse? The results have always been a bit unreliable (they usually include several mismatches, and sometimes exclude almost-perfect matches). Also, for some time it has said that "For GIF's we have bigger and better plans". Any update on them? It would be really helpful to search for previous GIF posts. Thanks! :)

Just letting you guys know, that we managed to reduce render time for NTP. And generally, site should be faster. Sadly due to heavy traffic, some of the systems are hanging more then they used to. So we will try to find a solution for that, which could result in commenting being a big glitchy for couple of days.

@Anon_e1tqSfVq9iEbI user is banned. We will tweak the config some more to avoid such cases in future. We will also go over his posts, to make sure correct people receive their points.

@Operator

@pornduke1 , a user previously unknown to me, has leveled up from 6 to 20 in 12 hours by accepting dozens and dozens of his own answers. It even appears that he answers his own questions right after posting them in what is surely one of the most egregious examples of "gaming" the system:

http://namethatporn.com/user/pornduke1.html

Is it a glitch that OPs can now accept their own answers? Regardless, it's clear that@pornduke1 is only after points and I suggest an immediate ban.

@NinNin we are currently trying out level-1 accept's. I cant say at the moment, that we will keep it like that. There are certainly many concerns about accept-quality.

Basically, if anybody has suggestions on this matter please email us. One thing that we will implement for sure, is that low levels can accept answers with X number of confirm votes. This ensures, that slightly higher levels can give their word, that the answer is correctly formatted and serves longer purpose.

Sadly however, we do see alot of wrongful confirms.

@Operator Currently, at what level can an OP accept an answer? I can't tell if there's been some recent moderation or if OPs at Level 1 can now accept answers.

@KeyMasterOfGozer Flagging the comment is correct way. The label there is from more moderated-times. Now the OP selecting answers rate is highest ever and mistakes will happen. Flagging wrong answer is the only way to do it.

Hopefully there will be a system for easier flagging, near in the future.

What should we do if we find a post that is marked "Correct", but is very easy to prove that it is wrong?

An Example is this one:

Name pls

1,181

2

5

10 years ago

There is a Flag for the comment, but when I click it, it says "Its wrong answer" is not valid for a flag.

There is also a Flag for the whole post, but it seems to imply the whole post might get removed. I don't think it needs to be removed, but it needs to not be marked "Correct". The entry box for that doesn't seem very big to give proof or explain the problem.

There is more advanced flood limitations in place from now. Currently the setup is at 1 post per 5 minutes and max of 24 posts per 24h. Because, lets be honest, if user is posting more then that, then its highly unlikely he/she will accept any answers or even cares if they get solved.

Also if you have more then 100 pending posts (non-threads), with possible answers and lower accept ratio then 50%, then you need to fix that before posting new stuff.

Sadly, I have to mention too that there is a anomaly in verification emails system, which affects verifying emails negatively. We are figuring out the bug as we speak.

There is further big developments to come, so keep yours eyes open for glitches and please due let us know, if there is any issues.

@KeyMasterOfGozer

That is a good question. I forgot to add the links.

If you are loggedin, then it should say Verified at:
https://account.namethatporn.com/

If not then click on the label and it should take you to:
https://account.namethatporn.com/verify_email

You can make sure you have the proper email used for NTP under your settings.

And if all else fails, then you can contact us about your account at:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact

@Operator
Where do I go to verify my email? Or how can I tell if it is done?

The verified account minimum date is lowered to 1. Jan of 2017. Meaning all accounts created after 1. Jan of this year require email verifications and old ones we will start notifying. If you are one of the old rollers and your account is not verified, you should really do that.

If you are one of the oldschool users and for some reason have a outdated email and cannot verify, you can contact us via email. Accounts themselves are always safe, we just want to aim to start 2018 with all accounts verified.

@NinNin Yes to basically all you wrote. That is all part of the master plan. It is just held up by all sort of little bumps on the road, that we have faced this year and overcome.

Moderation will be slightly more down start of autumn, but hopefully it will gradually regain. We will figure out how to redesign the UI, to make accept ratio more natural and to clean up content.

The correct syntax program still needs users input, who understand NTP or who understand development or have a crazy good idea. Because we have not yet found a good enough compromise, between bulk accepting risks vs. quality.

This topic basically waits for any sort of ridiculous ideas, that users might have to make accepts more natural, but yet aiming for accuracy:

Lets make confirms work together as community!

280

0

5

9 years ago

@Operator I'm over the moon that you're finally requiring all users to register. With the recent lack of moderation, this should put more pressure on the community to accept answers. (Of course, we still need regular moderation for the number of bounty questions many of us have answered.)

So there is no considerable drop in the quality of answers, I hope part of the master plan is to implement a system in which only answers given using tags are eligible to be accepted. Because when OPs accept unformatted answers, it goes against what this site is trying to do in building a database and is a slap in the face to those of us who bother to use correct syntax and who refer new users again and again to the Support and Help section.

The image issue for chrome users should be resolved and high quality images are popping up as we speak.

Also not loggedin users, cannot post questions or answer them from now on. You can still answer as anon, when loggedin. This is might seem radical change of the site, but ultimately it is part of the master plan to make the community better.

There might be slight quality drop for newer posts for Chrome users. If you find it giving you eye cancer, use any other browser then Chrome. We are working on fixing the issue and will parse images when the fix has been made, so not to worry, old images and new will all look extra crisp. Hopefully in next 24h.