Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
You can talk to staff here about general issues, but not about how to post! You can get that information here:
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
The ultimate noob guide
47.5k
82
11
7 years ago
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
116.2k
73
2,341
12 years ago
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
163.3k
139
4,459
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
#829364
OP
@herkalurk if the OP found the answer helpful, he can accept it in any shape or form he wants.
How is a user allowed to mark a question as correct that has absolutely no tags...?
What's the name of this porn star?
1,403
8
4
9 years ago
Answered#828940
OP
@WorkPlease Yes, sorry. It was a change from yesterday, but extra condition was not added. It is fixed now.
@WorldsBestPorn To be honest your example looks poor quality and should be trashed, but no. The screenshots I refer are the screenshots, where the OP could have used the media directly. For example:
Or where instead of copying the PH URL, they make a screen of it with their cellphones. That is very lazy and stupid approach, and we will have none of this here.
Though: If the OP has no other option and is aware of the rule and explains in the description: Sorry for the screenshot, I cropped it as good as possible. Its a special case, blabla. -- I guess then its OK.
@WorldsBestPorn To be honest your example looks poor quality and should be trashed, but no. The screenshots I refer are the screenshots, where the OP could have used the media directly. For example:
Plzzzz full movie...
50
0
0
8 years ago
Or where instead of copying the PH URL, they make a screen of it with their cellphones. That is very lazy and stupid approach, and we will have none of this here.
Though: If the OP has no other option and is aware of the rule and explains in the description: Sorry for the screenshot, I cropped it as good as possible. Its a special case, blabla. -- I guess then its OK.
@NinNin
No, it states something along the line that I'm not high level enough to make a thread. Maybe this was a recent change...
No, it states something along the line that I'm not high level enough to make a thread. Maybe this was a recent change...
"Also threads can be started by users of level 4 and above."
Apparently, I posted my question before coming upon this, so any post requires a level 4 account, and not only thread posts?
Apparently, I posted my question before coming upon this, so any post requires a level 4 account, and not only thread posts?
@Operator
What specifically do you mean by screenshot of videos? Something like this?
This is from a VHS tape recorded in the year 2000, so pointing my phone at the screen and taking a pic is literally the only way I can create a post about it. If I had a higher quality way to do this, then I would have certainly done it.
What specifically do you mean by screenshot of videos? Something like this?
This is from a VHS tape recorded in the year 2000, so pointing my phone at the screen and taking a pic is literally the only way I can create a post about it. If I had a higher quality way to do this, then I would have certainly done it.
#828645
OP
GUIDELINE
Screenshots of videos and media in generally will be trashed from now on.
Its very lazy from the OP and most of the times, the content can be linked or downloaded. There is almost never a valid excuse for screenshots. They look ugly, are poor on quality and can't be analysed by image reverse tools.
Also threads can be started by users of level 4 and above.
Screenshots of videos and media in generally will be trashed from now on.
Its very lazy from the OP and most of the times, the content can be linked or downloaded. There is almost never a valid excuse for screenshots. They look ugly, are poor on quality and can't be analysed by image reverse tools.
Also threads can be started by users of level 4 and above.
@Operator I know that the site is going through some big changes and not perfect yet. However, I would like to thank you for your hard work in making this site better for the members in the community. I'm willingly to be patient and let you know of any bugs to better this site. Again, I appreciate everything you're doing for us. I love this site and will continue to use it.
#826994
OP
@WorldsBestPorn It is exactly 3 as minimal. But it detects if they are unique. So if you add the same tag 3 times, it counts as 1. It shows error when less then 3, but info-non-error-message recommendation to add more then 5.
@BobyAnderson Email us with better details. Generally, I would stop uploading if it goes on for hours. Our servers are extremely fast and upload itself should never take above 60s. If you see it for hours, then the upload process failed without a message.
@BobyAnderson Email us with better details. Generally, I would stop uploading if it goes on for hours. Our servers are extremely fast and upload itself should never take above 60s. If you see it for hours, then the upload process failed without a message.
@NinNin
Exactly. 3 tags should be enough to post. For my post, my 1st 3 tags were lesbian, lesbians, and licking. But after it wouldn't let me post, I had to add just random words like girl, girls, ladies and women, which completely defeats of purpose of using tags. lol
Exactly. 3 tags should be enough to post. For my post, my 1st 3 tags were lesbian, lesbians, and licking. But after it wouldn't let me post, I had to add just random words like girl, girls, ladies and women, which completely defeats of purpose of using tags. lol
@Operator
I like the introduction of tags but I don't think users should be required to use them as it can result in a lot of thoughtless ones, such as "girl" and "pornstar". Tags should specific, e.g., "BBW", "Ebony", "MILF". The option of using nine tags is too many. Users should have to think about the tags most applicable to their posts.
I like the introduction of tags but I don't think users should be required to use them as it can result in a lot of thoughtless ones, such as "girl" and "pornstar". Tags should specific, e.g., "BBW", "Ebony", "MILF". The option of using nine tags is too many. Users should have to think about the tags most applicable to their posts.
@Operator
Ah, I see. Using commas worked, although when I posted my 3 tags, it still said I needed more. So I added 5, and it still said I needed more. Then 7, and it still wanted more. It wasn't until I added 9 tags is when it let me finally post. 9 tags is way too much and takes up way too much time.
Ah, I see. Using commas worked, although when I posted my 3 tags, it still said I needed more. So I added 5, and it still said I needed more. Then 7, and it still wanted more. It wasn't until I added 9 tags is when it let me finally post. 9 tags is way too much and takes up way too much time.
#826844
OP
@WorldsBestPorn Since we wanted to allow tags with spaces in them, then there needs to be a way to separate the tags. Just put comas between them please.
But its interesting, that you didn't notice the label or placeholders. Should it be stated in the information box as well? Our aim and my personal fetish was to make the submitter as bulletproof and with-a-lot-of-information as possible. But it may be, that there is too much information.
But its interesting, that you didn't notice the label or placeholders. Should it be stated in the information box as well? Our aim and my personal fetish was to make the submitter as bulletproof and with-a-lot-of-information as possible. But it may be, that there is too much information.
@Operator
The new submitter has become very bitchy indeed, since it won't let me upload at all. As you can see here, it says to post at least 3 tags, and I've posted well over that amount, but it still won't let me upload my pic.
The new submitter has become very bitchy indeed, since it won't let me upload at all. As you can see here, it says to post at least 3 tags, and I've posted well over that amount, but it still won't let me upload my pic.
#826124
OP
UPDATE
Submitter
So we have been working hard on introducing changes, that are needed to support the future features (review panel for example). This also includes getting content quality up. To do that, we needed better media detection, tags, more strict rules while submitting -- new submitter.
The new submitter is very bitchy and requires more of your input to submit your content. For example minimal of 3 tags and fully custom title. Yet, hopefully it is more easy then the old one, as there are information containers everywhere (with placeholders and etc.)
While we made the submitter more bitchy, there is now local library upload feature for pictures and GIF.
There is also a media check step, where under some criteria duplicate content detection will show related / already submitter posts as an option. This will hopefully reduce broken media content and reduce duplicate content.
NB! If something fails, the submitter could be disabled at any given moment. Old submitter will be presented as an alternative.
Tags
Tags are very much beta yet, but we are working on all possible issues as they come up. Tags main page is still under development.
We expect bugs and glitches in regards to tags, so if you guys find any problems. Let us know please.
Other
Also, post editing and deleting is available for level 1 now. This is possible now, because heavy anti-spam features are implemented for editing.
If post is locally uploaded, then there cannot be SOURCE button. We are working on a download originally button however.
webp format is accepted when remote URL or directly uploaded from now on.
Submitter
So we have been working hard on introducing changes, that are needed to support the future features (review panel for example). This also includes getting content quality up. To do that, we needed better media detection, tags, more strict rules while submitting -- new submitter.
The new submitter is very bitchy and requires more of your input to submit your content. For example minimal of 3 tags and fully custom title. Yet, hopefully it is more easy then the old one, as there are information containers everywhere (with placeholders and etc.)
While we made the submitter more bitchy, there is now local library upload feature for pictures and GIF.
There is also a media check step, where under some criteria duplicate content detection will show related / already submitter posts as an option. This will hopefully reduce broken media content and reduce duplicate content.
NB! If something fails, the submitter could be disabled at any given moment. Old submitter will be presented as an alternative.
Tags
Tags are very much beta yet, but we are working on all possible issues as they come up. Tags main page is still under development.
We expect bugs and glitches in regards to tags, so if you guys find any problems. Let us know please.
Other
Also, post editing and deleting is available for level 1 now. This is possible now, because heavy anti-spam features are implemented for editing.
If post is locally uploaded, then there cannot be SOURCE button. We are working on a download originally button however.
webp format is accepted when remote URL or directly uploaded from now on.
#825319
OP
If there is an issue with an answer, then please flag it. This thread is not a good place to mark them.
@fenasikerim if the OP is happy with the answer he/she got, then that is OP's right. If OP is also the answerer and there is no spam, then there is no problem. The answer was open 1 year, he wanted closure..
@fenasikerim if the OP is happy with the answer he/she got, then that is OP's right. If OP is also the answerer and there is no spam, then there is no problem. The answer was open 1 year, he wanted closure..
SPONSORED
Other solved questions