Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
You can talk to staff here about general issues, but not about how to post! You can get that information here:
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
The ultimate noob guide
47.5k
82
11
7 years ago
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
116.2k
73
2,341
12 years ago
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
163.3k
139
4,459
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
@Operator
The filter is working now? This is the greatest day in the history of NTP ^_^ But I do have questions about flagging older TS content:
Do you want us to click the flag button, and then post CAT_SHEMALE as the reason for the flag, or do you want us to simply post that in the comments? Also, do we get points for doing this? lol
The filter is working now? This is the greatest day in the history of NTP ^_^ But I do have questions about flagging older TS content:
Do you want us to click the flag button, and then post CAT_SHEMALE as the reason for the flag, or do you want us to simply post that in the comments? Also, do we get points for doing this? lol
#838181
OP
UPDATE
The TS filter aka content nature selector button is visible now and waits for your feedback.
The nature selector should work by merging your preferences together in the masonry (items grid pageses), search, latest comments and random unsolved posts. It will have no effect in your profile, your favorites/followings, image reverse search and direct links.
This means, if you have selected only "Straight" as content nature and visit shemale tag, then in theory there should not be anything visible. Same goes for search and all the above mentioned.
At the moment it will not save into your account settings, but locally to your browser. You can feedback on this matter, if you think it should be hooked to your account as well. So if you come from a fresh PC, it will be default as "Straight" and once you login, it will set it to whatever it was last time you logged out/in.
Gay content currently is still not enabled in the submitter, as we need to test it out before. However, the existing gay content in NTP, is correctly re-labeled, so the nature is not empty.
Once again, please flag mislabeled content as CAT_SHEMALE or CAT_GAY if you see anything in "Straight"-mode. Thanks.
The TS filter aka content nature selector button is visible now and waits for your feedback.
The nature selector should work by merging your preferences together in the masonry (items grid pageses), search, latest comments and random unsolved posts. It will have no effect in your profile, your favorites/followings, image reverse search and direct links.
This means, if you have selected only "Straight" as content nature and visit shemale tag, then in theory there should not be anything visible. Same goes for search and all the above mentioned.
At the moment it will not save into your account settings, but locally to your browser. You can feedback on this matter, if you think it should be hooked to your account as well. So if you come from a fresh PC, it will be default as "Straight" and once you login, it will set it to whatever it was last time you logged out/in.
Gay content currently is still not enabled in the submitter, as we need to test it out before. However, the existing gay content in NTP, is correctly re-labeled, so the nature is not empty.
Once again, please flag mislabeled content as CAT_SHEMALE or CAT_GAY if you see anything in "Straight"-mode. Thanks.
#838060
OP
We are inches away from launching the TS filter. It would speed up the launch if you guys could flag all TS/shemale and gay content. Nothing will be deleted, it will be re-labeled and temporary disappear, due to your default setting.
Once the button is activated, where you can switch it, then all content will come back up.
Best way to flag it is: CAT_SHEMALE or CAT_GAY Nothing else is needed, just the correct category marker and we can easily pick it up from there.
You can find this content from knowing known TS pornstars names, search function, tags and etc.
Once again, we won't delete posts or suspend users from this point onwards on this matter. The content will be re-labeled in the system and temporary hide away from general view, but still be visible from direct link, favorites, profile feed and reverse image search.
Once the button is activated, where you can switch it, then all content will come back up.
Best way to flag it is: CAT_SHEMALE or CAT_GAY Nothing else is needed, just the correct category marker and we can easily pick it up from there.
You can find this content from knowing known TS pornstars names, search function, tags and etc.
Once again, we won't delete posts or suspend users from this point onwards on this matter. The content will be re-labeled in the system and temporary hide away from general view, but still be visible from direct link, favorites, profile feed and reverse image search.
#837217
OP
@WorldsBestPorn The TS filter aka content orientation was working already, but there was (big) performance issues. The test was not public of course.
If the solution starts hanging the site's load time, then it obviously cannot be launched like that. Once we have solved this problem, then it can be tested semi-publicly and launched if no issues appear.
If the solution starts hanging the site's load time, then it obviously cannot be launched like that. Once we have solved this problem, then it can be tested semi-publicly and launched if no issues appear.
@Operator
After using the "post tags" for a few weeks now, I have to admit that I think they are a benefit to this site. And if they get us closer to having the Straight/TS/Gay filter become operational, then I'm all for it, but I do have some questions:
How far away is the filter from working and how exactly will it work? For example, if someone creates a post and selects TS as the orientation, where can that post be seen? Obviously it won't appear on the homepage with all the "straight" posts, so where will it go? Also, how will those posts be moderated, or will OP's only be able to accept answers for TS posts?
After using the "post tags" for a few weeks now, I have to admit that I think they are a benefit to this site. And if they get us closer to having the Straight/TS/Gay filter become operational, then I'm all for it, but I do have some questions:
How far away is the filter from working and how exactly will it work? For example, if someone creates a post and selects TS as the orientation, where can that post be seen? Obviously it won't appear on the homepage with all the "straight" posts, so where will it go? Also, how will those posts be moderated, or will OP's only be able to accept answers for TS posts?
@Afshin6969 you have to wait for the user who posted the question to confirm it. It all depends on them. You might wait few hours or few years for that to happen and im not kidding you. That is why you have to check the profile of the user and see if he is confirming the answers. And no matter how simple the question might be, your answer might go unconfirmed for a long time. If the user himself does not confirm it, then the staff has to, and that might take some time, again, depending on how "easy" the answer is. It takes a lot of patience.
@AdolfJongUn69 the 2nd question asks for a video, not just identification, you have no videos linked for that answer, so it's not complete.
So what is the current method of getting answers “marked correct”? I have noticed several users and myself included that have answered posts, with correct formatting and tags, that have confirms on the post and yet they don’t get marked “correct” and no points awarded.
Just wondering what the process is so I can change what I’m doing if I need to.
Just wondering what the process is so I can change what I’m doing if I need to.
@Operator We're definitely talking about post tags. Name tagging is extremely useful and a great reference tool on this site. I've posted many answers with just the name, knowing when I click on the actors' link I will find a similarly answered post of the same video or image to use as proof for the current answer, then edit my post accordingly. I don't think anyone is disputing the usability of them. Post tagging for me is useless. I understand it may be for others by my mind won't come up with the same tags for an image as the next guy, or for that matter the general user. So it frustrates me personally.
#829844
OP
I have a feeling that 2/3 guys are talking about post-tags and 1/3 is talking about name-tags. From now on, we have to be careful with our terms. Name-tags and post-tags are easily mixed up.
And neither of them are going away. We can make them more easy to use, but being consistent on criticising a feature, wont make it go away.
Only 3 post-tags are required. Separated by comas and they have to be unique. Useless tags will be picked up and denied, they are at the moment: porn, girl, woman, female, male, naked, name, etc, for, and, idk, lol, off (more will be added)
This means, if you select your post type, write a title-question, describe your post with 3 tags and its submitted -- What is the problem?
Name-tagging is here to stay as well. But hopefully we can make some detection for more easy usage. Sadly right now the PS database is very large, and we cannot detect all names from your content automatically.
And neither of them are going away. We can make them more easy to use, but being consistent on criticising a feature, wont make it go away.
Only 3 post-tags are required. Separated by comas and they have to be unique. Useless tags will be picked up and denied, they are at the moment: porn, girl, woman, female, male, naked, name, etc, for, and, idk, lol, off (more will be added)
This means, if you select your post type, write a title-question, describe your post with 3 tags and its submitted -- What is the problem?
Name-tagging is here to stay as well. But hopefully we can make some detection for more easy usage. Sadly right now the PS database is very large, and we cannot detect all names from your content automatically.
I don't get the objections against tags. Is it really that hard to come up with 3 tags that describe your content? We'll put auto-complete there eventually and there will be a tags index page, so if you need "ideas" you can pick and choose from a list.
This is all about content filtration. Say you're a fan/specialist of a certain niche and would like to answer/browse only hentai, ebony, asian, camgirls etc etc posts. Now you can, without having to go through 1000's of posts that you're not interested in.
@WorldsBestPorn Tags are directly tied into that. Thanks to tags the filter is one step away.
@clueless_pornster Thanks for the suggestion. We're trying to do something similar to what you described. But it can't be tied to level only.
This is all about content filtration. Say you're a fan/specialist of a certain niche and would like to answer/browse only hentai, ebony, asian, camgirls etc etc posts. Now you can, without having to go through 1000's of posts that you're not interested in.
@WorldsBestPorn Tags are directly tied into that. Thanks to tags the filter is one step away.
@clueless_pornster Thanks for the suggestion. We're trying to do something similar to what you described. But it can't be tied to level only.
In response to@herkalurk post, I'm just putting this out there but I don't know if it will be a good solution to our problem. What if we make the high level members (ex. level 95+) able to mark answers as correct? Of course, only with the correct tags and confirm links. I believe that will help with OP not accepting answers as well as OP accepting answers without correct tags. The high level members can be something like "Member Answer Moderator".
However, let's say we do go with the solution above. There will be times when the OP doesn't like the answers accepted by the "Member Answer Moderator" or that the accepted answer is wrong on his post. He can decline the accepted answer providing an explanation and choose the answer that he prefers.
Again, this is just an idea. I'm not demanding this solution or anything.
However, let's say we do go with the solution above. There will be times when the OP doesn't like the answers accepted by the "Member Answer Moderator" or that the accepted answer is wrong on his post. He can decline the accepted answer providing an explanation and choose the answer that he prefers.
Again, this is just an idea. I'm not demanding this solution or anything.
@NinNin @Operator
I honestly don't see the use for tags on a site like this at all. How do they help my post get answered quicker? If someone knows the answer, then it's not going to matter what my tags say. No one is using tags to decide what posts they will answer and which ones they won't, so a more useful tool that should be used is the Straight/TS/Gay filter that has talked about for 2 years. That would be much more beneficial than tags would.
I honestly don't see the use for tags on a site like this at all. How do they help my post get answered quicker? If someone knows the answer, then it's not going to matter what my tags say. No one is using tags to decide what posts they will answer and which ones they won't, so a more useful tool that should be used is the Straight/TS/Gay filter that has talked about for 2 years. That would be much more beneficial than tags would.
@Operator I'll be honest I'm not a fan of the tags. I get why you want it, but for me it's annoying when I'm making a new post more than anything. Mostly cause I don't even know what to tag it with.
#829571
OP
Yes, I saw that too. But yet, forcing users to select correct makes sort of more good then bad. This is isolated situation.
In theory we can set the level minimum higher on users, who need at least 1 confirm on a post. Currently its level 1's, who need their answers to be confirmed first, then they can select is as correct.
Having said that: If you see level 1 OP, then confirm the answers in his post, or he wont be able to mark it as correct.
Basically, we will firstly work on making the answering function more bitchy like submitter. So if there is no tags, it will start giving warnings and etc. Sort of guide the users trough the process. This as like submitter's moods, wont affect good users, who already follow a good standard on making answers.
If this doesn't work, we will start limiting user's ability to do stuff. For example, you are selecting corrects wrongful, we will remove that option from you.. also if you do stupid flags and waste our time, you wont be able to flag anymore and etc etc. This in theory could be used on any action.
In theory we can set the level minimum higher on users, who need at least 1 confirm on a post. Currently its level 1's, who need their answers to be confirmed first, then they can select is as correct.
Having said that: If you see level 1 OP, then confirm the answers in his post, or he wont be able to mark it as correct.
Basically, we will firstly work on making the answering function more bitchy like submitter. So if there is no tags, it will start giving warnings and etc. Sort of guide the users trough the process. This as like submitter's moods, wont affect good users, who already follow a good standard on making answers.
If this doesn't work, we will start limiting user's ability to do stuff. For example, you are selecting corrects wrongful, we will remove that option from you.. also if you do stupid flags and waste our time, you wont be able to flag anymore and etc etc. This in theory could be used on any action.
@Operator
As I’ve suggested here before, answers without tags should be ineligible to be accepted. Noticeable changes have been made to improve user experience; I don't see why this can't be one of them.
What's more, the OP who posted the question@herkalurk referenced had accepted dozens of answers simply because he had to in order to post more questions:
https://namethatporn.com/user/gaara379.html
There are many users like him who don't care about tags or giving credit to the right person. Why would they? They already have their answers.
As I’ve suggested here before, answers without tags should be ineligible to be accepted. Noticeable changes have been made to improve user experience; I don't see why this can't be one of them.
What's more, the OP who posted the question@herkalurk referenced had accepted dozens of answers simply because he had to in order to post more questions:
https://namethatporn.com/user/gaara379.html
There are many users like him who don't care about tags or giving credit to the right person. Why would they? They already have their answers.
#829464
OP
@herkalurk How do we stop OP, who is asking the question to accept answers, that are helpful for him? OP's are not moderators. There is no way to control this.
@Operator if we're pushing to have everything tagged correctly, why are we allowing a user to accept untagged answers? Not to mention the answer chosen had no different information. I know I'm not the first to have a answer chosen over my own and it's very frustrating to comply with all of the tagging site rules and provide numerous links of proof only to have a poorly formatted answer get chosen.
SPONSORED
Other solved questions