Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.

@Operator
@Don

Can you explain to me why the below answer isn't enough info? You have been allowing videos with no other proof and names as enough in the past few months, so why is it a problem when I do it? Also, lets not forget that I included the links to numerous solved answers that show those are the names of those ladies. If those aren't good enough you'll have to take the points back from numerous users.

Who is the girl in pink?

248

0

2

6 years ago

@Odetomaybe it may be that xvideos changed how their videos are embedded before compared to now, and old videos posted here still uses the old embedding code. That's the only reason I can think of.

I can't login from Firefox only from chrome. Disabled all pop up blockers etc. But still only works on chrome. On firefox site loads but when I go to login it says "something went wrong" and gives a me link to try again which takes me back to the login page. Anyone else have this?

@Operator

@Don

webmaseter

Can you improve messages - chats - who, when - notifications. It's not always clear who you got the message from, it's often confusing.

Thanks.

@WorldsBestPorn

You don't have to worry about that; mods don't have unlimited power over users, they can hand out short-time suspensions. Perma-banning can only be done by admins, and we would certainly address wrongful suspensions.

The 3-year-old post wasn't the best place to inquire about your methods at, since it confused things a bit further.

At the end of day mods are just volunteers who try to help out, I can assure you they aren't out there to pick on people. Suspensions are always a last resort and usually only used against spammers.

We do appreciate your contributions to the site and think you are a valuable member of the community. And I'm glad everything got cleared up now!

@Don

The mod is well aware you are not breaking any rules, nor receiving any advantage by answering your questions. It was definitely genuine confusion, not some ill-conceived comment.

I would agree with that the first time the mod questioned me, Don. But the 2nd time he specifically accused me of "clearly knowing the answer" to a post before I posted it. Don, he didn't ask if I knew it, or say he believed I knew it. He said I CLEARLY knew it. And remember, the evidence he presented to prove that I "clearly" knew it was a 3 year old post that I answered just 2 days ago. So if someone in a position of power (like a mod) accuses you of something with zero evidence, then I'm sure anyone would want the opportunity to defend themselves, and that's what I did here. I love this site, Don. That's why I've been here for nearly 5 years, so when I get accused by a mod who definitely seems to believe I'm doing "something" wrong, (although he clearly didn't know exactly what), what's to stop him from banning me unilaterally? That's why I had to talk to you about this before things progressed any further, and I'm glad that we were able to come to an understanding. I'll try to cut back on the posting, although I don't believe I create much more than 3 posts a day anyway. And yes, Nearly 200 of my posts were indeed answered by me, but that's 200 out of 5,473 answers that I have posted here, so I'm just doing my best to be an active member of this community. Thank you for your time.

@WorldsBestPorn

I think you are projecting a bit. The mod is well aware you are not breaking any rules, nor receiving any advantage by answering your questions. It was definitely genuine confusion, not some ill-conceived comment.

Plenty of users have answered their own questions at some point. It's just that yours appeared to be very systematic. Nearly 200 of your questions have been answered by yourself. And a significant portion of them have been answered within 15 minutes of posting. This is where things started to look a bit spammy.

But thank you for clearing things up. I get the fact that this process saves you time. And you providing answers is better than just leaving them unanswered. So it does provide some potential value for others.

I'd recommend using an image hosting service like:
https://postimages.org/

And then, use the uploaded image link to create your request after you have reverse searched it.

But unless a lot of other users start doing the same thing, I don't think this is really an issue.

@Don

The answer is posted 2 minutes after the post is created.

Exactly. Like I said earlier, it usually takes me 8-12 mins, but that doesn't mean it always takes me that long, so that one I got in 2. But did you find a post where I got it in 5 seconds? How about 20? 25? If I'm constantly accepting my own answers mere "moments" after I post them as the mod implies, then there should be a lot of posts way shorter than 2 mins, since there would be no reason for me to wait even that long to accept my own answers. As for that one specifically, clearly since I already knew the names of both performers and the production studio before I uploaded the pic, finding the video was lite work after the image search. I do have a Level of 133, Don. So it isn't odd for me to find an answer in just over 2 mins if I already have most of the info before I even came here. But you did say something very interesting:

It would make sense to post a question only after you already tried reverse searching it yourself.

True. But how can I reverse image a pic that doesn't even exist online until I upload it first, Don? See, before NTP added direct uploading, I would do exactly what you said. I'd upload my pic to Twitter and reverse image search it there. Then only if I couldn't find it, I would copy the URL for the pic and post it here. But the addition of direct uploading allowed me to cut out the middle man (Twitter) and upload directly here, saving me time and allowing me up create many more posts than before. A side effect of this is that I did indeed start answering way more of my own posts, simply because there were more posts here to be answered. Remember, this was now the site I was using to upload my pics instead of Twitter. Now I suppose I could go back to uploading my pics to Twitter first just to please this 1 mod who seems to already believe I'm guilty of something, but why? I've clearly done absolutely nothing wrong, and all of this could have been explained to the mod directly if he simply didn't approach me (TWICE) in an accusatory manner right off the bat. That's the issue I'm having here, Don. You've done a much better job getting to the bottom of this than he did, so this is something the mod should have done from the start.

To be fair, that has happened to me too a few times. Spent a long time searching and couldn't find it, posted a question and then found the answer a few minutes later. Heck, once I even got the answer from the random posts on the right while looking at the post I just posted, even though the reverse image search struck nil.

Odd behavior perhaps, but not unheard of :)

@WorldsBestPorn

FULL vid of Amira and Orina from Lezcuties

131

0

1

5 years ago

Answered

The answer is posted 2 minutes after the post is created.

I don't understand why you are getting so offended over the word "odd." This is exactly what it is. It's a very unusual method.

It would make sense to post a question only after you already tried reverse searching it yourself. If you can find and post a tagged answer in 2 minutes, it seems very unnecessary to even make a request for it.

@Don

"You post a question and then immediately answer the question yourself only moments later"

I like what you did there, Don. You used the word "moments" as if to imply I answered my own posts literally within seconds of posting them, which we both know is 100% inaccurate. None of the examples that you posted show I answered any post within seconds. Now if by "moments" you mean the amount of time it takes to...

1. Upload the pic

2. Use the NTP image search on the pic

3. If that fails, use other sites' image search on the pic

4. Find what I was looking for by using those image searches

5. Post the answer

6. Correctly bracket the answer

7. Accept the answer and move on with my life

...then you would be 100% accurate. Now what exactly is "odd" about anything I did here, Don? That entire method usually takes about 8-12 mins, which is hardly "moments" after I first post. Even the post you said was a "good example" was answered in this exact same 7-part method, just like all the rest I answered. So after I post a pic here, should I not continue to try to find the answer for myself? Should I just hope and pray that someone else will find it for me? Well considering I still have 3 and 4-year old unanswered posts, that's not an option for me. So yes, I do consider it harassment when a so-called mod doesn't simply ask me about by behavior, but labels it as "odd" before even speaking to me about it. And when I come here to this thread simply to ask for clarification about what he was even talking about, he comes after me a second time, but this time he links to a 3 year old post, which PROVES I didn't answer it "moments" after I posted it like you both claimed I did. How hard is it to simply admit the so-called mod jumped to conclusions too quickly?

To be fair, the post@WorldsBestPorn linked to below is not a good example of when to answer your own question because he answered it moments after posting.

@WorldsBestPorn Being asked to clear a few things up isn't exactly harassment. There's no need to get so defensive about this. The post you linked is completely fine and actually a good example when to answer your own question.

However, here are some posts which illustrate the point the moderator was making there:

FULL vid from lesbian x

290

1

1

5 years ago

Answered

FULL vid of Amira and Orina from Lezcuties

131

0

1

5 years ago

Answered

FULL vid of lesbian threesome

921

1

1

5 years ago

Answered

FULL vid of lezbos

659

2

1

5 years ago

Answered

NAME of blond?

122

0

1

5 years ago

Answered

FULL vid of kira noir lesbian

1,062

2

1

5 years ago

Answered

You post a question and then immediately answer the question yourself only moments later. The fact that you don't get any points for this, is exactly what makes your behavior look odd.

@Odetomaybe We spotted the problem, and it will be fixed shortly.

@Bibissimo @herkalurk

That's exactly what I'm eluding too. You don't get ANY POINTS for accepting your own answer, even 3 years down the line, so why is this mod calling me doing so "odd"? Is he not aware of this simple fact? And if he's not, then how the hell did he become a mod here?

@Bibissimo you don't get points for accepting your own answer, so it's not a points thing.

@WorldsBestPorn i think they suspect that you wanted to earn a lot of points by waiting a lot of time to answer, so they wanted you to explain it. I just think you're very lucky ahah

@Operator @Don

Why am I being harassed by a mod here?

FULL vid of doggystyle scene from mainstream movie?

636

0

5

5 years ago

Answered

Calling my behavior "odd"? What's odd about responding to a post that you later found the answer to? Are we not supposed to answer posts here? Even if it's occasionally our own posts? Then why do we have the ability to accept our own answers if we're not allowed to? At one point the mod claimed that I "clearly knew the answer to a post before I posted it", even though the post he was referencing was THREE YEARS OLD when I answered it. Was I supposed to wait SIX years for someone to answer it instead? How absurd. When I later find out an answer to a post I created, I answer it simply because there are more people than just myself who are following that post and want it to be answered. So for the good of the community I share that answer with others and close the post instead of keeping it to myself, but apparently this mod thinks somehow sharing answered posts with others is wrong. I have no clue why and would like an explanation from someone.

-WBP

@Operator @Don

What exactly is a "Moderator message" and why do I have to explain my behavior to it?

FULL vid of doggystyle scene from mainstream movie?

636

0

5

5 years ago

Answered