Staff thread. Ask. Suggest. Get info.
You can talk to staff here about general issues, but not about how to post! You can get that information here:
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
https://namethatporn.com/help/faq.html
For community rules:
https://namethatporn.com/help.html
Violation of rules may result in suspension or ban from the site.
For account related issues, please contact us via:
https://account.namethatporn.com/contact
For other specific issues by email:
http://namethatporn.com/help/about-us.html
For beginner stuff, check out Yonis thread:
The ultimate noob guide
28.6k
55
11
5 years ago
For questions that can be answered by other members:
Any "Name That Porn" QUESTIONS..?
90.9k
54
1,705
10 years ago
Do not ask porn related questions here! To ask a question, create a new post.
142.3k
121
3,931
·
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
http://www.iafd.com/graphics/headshots/jthrust_m_jthrust.jpg
i can't submit this image because it's apparently too small, but the image itself is from the movie i'm looking for. johnny thrust is photographing a blonde model in a bathing suit when Kyle stone comes over and starts speaking to some mob guys.johnny gets called over and dunked in the water and told to take pictures of the model's asshole
i can't submit this image because it's apparently too small, but the image itself is from the movie i'm looking for. johnny thrust is photographing a blonde model in a bathing suit when Kyle stone comes over and starts speaking to some mob guys.johnny gets called over and dunked in the water and told to take pictures of the model's asshole
@Anxiousexy I agree, if you're going to use a previously answered question as your reference, there should be a working link in it.
Under current guidelines, the answer could have been declined for lack of proof. But I see why it received confirms. Ideally, one (or all) of the confirmers would have asked@giovanirock to update his link, but most of these answers slip through the cracks.@barelylegalfan you were right to bring it up.
@barelylegalfan I agree, the FAQs need to be updated. I've been asking that for years on this thread. Regardless, when the question asks for a video, a link to a pay site is not sufficient. If it was, then we've all been wasting our time trying to find free video links!
Say what you want about@herkalurk . His comments and contributions have been more constructive than your recent ones.
Under current guidelines, the answer could have been declined for lack of proof. But I see why it received confirms. Ideally, one (or all) of the confirmers would have asked@giovanirock to update his link, but most of these answers slip through the cracks.@barelylegalfan you were right to bring it up.
@barelylegalfan I agree, the FAQs need to be updated. I've been asking that for years on this thread. Regardless, when the question asks for a video, a link to a pay site is not sufficient. If it was, then we've all been wasting our time trying to find free video links!
Say what you want about@herkalurk . His comments and contributions have been more constructive than your recent ones.
@Anxiousexy you have it completely backwards. I complained because my 100% correct answer was marked by a Human Mod as partial because it 100% correctly linked to the full paid version of the Video. At no point did the OP ask for a FREE version of it. Then that Human Mod linked the FAQ's as reason for marking it as Partial, later stating it was because I linked a paid version of the video instead of free but literally nowhere in that FAQ does it state video links MUST be free.
A Human Mod deprived my 100% correct answer from being marked correct by using flawed logic and poorly written FAQ's. You can claim umbrage all you want, but I'm still correct in my complaint.
A Human Mod deprived my 100% correct answer from being marked correct by using flawed logic and poorly written FAQ's. You can claim umbrage all you want, but I'm still correct in my complaint.
@gricnime yes you are right, only the name is requested but a video for confirmation is also necessary, and there’s no video. Clicking on her name tag you will realize that the questions with this GIF/pic all are answered provideing the same video, which is now dead. That link was acceptable as confirmation then but now isn’t, so technically it lacks proof.
I know videos are taken down in seconds but this doesn’t seem the case.
What’s really important it’s what I was trying to explain to @barelylegalfan: how AM works, streaming links work and constructive criticism. What he ignores is that OP has the right to accept answers without name tags if he wants to
I know videos are taken down in seconds but this doesn’t seem the case.
What’s really important it’s what I was trying to explain to @barelylegalfan: how AM works, streaming links work and constructive criticism. What he ignores is that OP has the right to accept answers without name tags if he wants to
i don't see the point of this debate. the question was the name of the porn star, giovanirock provided the name and the link to the post as a confirmation. so why should the linked post or the reference post have a working video if that was not even requested? And that "dead" video was posted 2 years ago! videos are sometimes deleted in matter of days or hours. so why should years be exception.
and barelylegalfan called mods idiots cause of this question
the question was "where can i find this VIDEO" not who is this porn star and where can i buy her videos. so, and maybe this is just me, when someone provides the working video and the op accepts it, well, who is the idiot here? the guy who is missing the key ingredient to the question asked or the mods? so, again, there is a pointless debate here all because one user keeps missing the obvious.
and barelylegalfan called mods idiots cause of this question
Where can I find this video?
1,313
9
3
7 years ago
Answered@NinNin what’s more likely? A 2 yo video deleted shortly after people have confirmed the answer as correct or lazy confirmers hungry for points in the confirm thread? Cmon you already said it: it happens everyday and this makes me think the penalty for wrong confirm is too little
But I have too agree with you that AM isn’t responsible for wrong answers, people are. 1 wrong confirm= 7 days of being unable to confirm answers and drastically reduce the “weight” of his confirms would make it more punishing
@barelylegalfan It’s simple: rules are like 6 yo and haven’t been updated since, it’s time for a refresh
But please make constructive criticism: don’t just trash mods, instead help the community suggesting how it can be improved
But I have too agree with you that AM isn’t responsible for wrong answers, people are. 1 wrong confirm= 7 days of being unable to confirm answers and drastically reduce the “weight” of his confirms would make it more punishing
@barelylegalfan It’s simple: rules are like 6 yo and haven’t been updated since, it’s time for a refresh
But please make constructive criticism: don’t just trash mods, instead help the community suggesting how it can be improved
@NinNin it's 100% valid to hold the AM and Human Mods accountable for discrepancies in marking Threads as Correct or Partial. As for the AM marking correct a post with Confirm bombs even when the proof link is a dead link, that literally proves the AM is flawed.
The fact that the Mods/Owners of this site refuse to acknowledge and then work to fix/improve the AM shows their worth.
Then you have shit stains like Hurkalurk (sp?) that constantly tells others how to answer when he doesn't even stick to that methodology is his own answers.
@Moderator, irrelevant if people come here for 'Free' vs 'Paid' videos. When a Human Mod links the Rules as to why they marked an answer as Partial, then those very same Rules should state clearly that all confirm video links MUST be Free, otherwise the Human Mods can fuck off and stop marking Answers as Partial using that excuse.
The fact that the Mods/Owners of this site refuse to acknowledge and then work to fix/improve the AM shows their worth.
Then you have shit stains like Hurkalurk (sp?) that constantly tells others how to answer when he doesn't even stick to that methodology is his own answers.
@Moderator, irrelevant if people come here for 'Free' vs 'Paid' videos. When a Human Mod links the Rules as to why they marked an answer as Partial, then those very same Rules should state clearly that all confirm video links MUST be Free, otherwise the Human Mods can fuck off and stop marking Answers as Partial using that excuse.
@Anxiousexy We don't know when the link was deleted. But if an answer with a dead link was confirmed by a handful of users, this may be an example of sloppy confirm trading on the confirm thread, which I see every day.
Ultimately, the integrity of this site depends on its users. Hold each other accountable rather than blaming auto mod or mods.
Ultimately, the integrity of this site depends on its users. Hold each other accountable rather than blaming auto mod or mods.
@NinNin nope. Giovanirock posted 4 days ago as reference a 2 yo answer with the video requested by OP. He hasn't edited the answer/comment since. I think it's safe to say he didn't check the link but just looked for the same image to see if it was solved before without thinking that a video link could be dead after 2 years
@barelylegalfan @Anxiousexy I think it's more likely that the video was deleted after the question was answered and received at least some confirms, which are quality confirms. It's not unusual for a video to be deleted from its source within hours of posting an answer.
As far as the "rules", they haven't been updated in years. It's more helpful to refer to@Yoni 's noob guide pinned at the top of this thread which was vetted by@Operator .
As far as the "rules", they haven't been updated in years. It's more helpful to refer to@Yoni 's noob guide pinned at the top of this thread which was vetted by@Operator .
@barelylegalfan AM doesn’t have any flaws, what orientates its algorithm is the number of confirms and the trustability of confirmers, this means that the actual human moderator is more likely to fail to accept the right answers than the AM. I don’t know if it’s worse a level 200+ answer adding a dead link or 10 people confirm-bombing without checking the source first.
Regarding the free links... NTP differentiates between original publisher links from embed videos, the first ones are used as proof/reference and the latter as streaming sources. It’s pretty obvious that nobody comes here to search for a video that has a big fat watermark like HardX if he’s already a paying member of that site
Regarding the free links... NTP differentiates between original publisher links from embed videos, the first ones are used as proof/reference and the latter as streaming sources. It’s pretty obvious that nobody comes here to search for a video that has a big fat watermark like HardX if he’s already a paying member of that site
Once again, yet ANOTHER Thread solved by the "Perfect" auto_moderator with a dead link. All while the actual Human Moderators mark responses as partial if they have a dead link. Seems legit.
@Moderator, literally NO WHERE do the Rules for answering a question state that the video linked MUST be free. Don't worry, I took a screen shot of the Rules just in case you decide to change them now and claim umbrage.
What's the name of this porn star?
421
3
3
7 years ago
Answered@Moderator, literally NO WHERE do the Rules for answering a question state that the video linked MUST be free. Don't worry, I took a screen shot of the Rules just in case you decide to change them now and claim umbrage.
Moderator message
@johnnyb645
Screenshots in answers are fine. Anything that helps with answer.
Mobile screenshots in a question can be deleted. When posting it explicitly states WE DO NOT ALLOW SCREENSHOTS MADE WITH PHONES! Yet people do it all the time.
Screenshots in answers are fine. Anything that helps with answer.
Mobile screenshots in a question can be deleted. When posting it explicitly states WE DO NOT ALLOW SCREENSHOTS MADE WITH PHONES! Yet people do it all the time.
In regards to the stated reason following post was trashed.
"No screen shots" in particular. Are you saying not to include one in answer?
Take this one for example
1st small picture is a good match for this post
If a video link was provided that started in the bedroom, this screen shot would help link OP's pic to the supplied video.
TY mod for prompt reply.
What is the name of this girl and where can I find this video?
456
1
1
6 years ago
AnsweredTake this one for example
1st small picture is a good match for this post
Where can I find this video?
347
3
1
9 years ago
AnsweredTY mod for prompt reply.
Moderator message
@DickManBoss
The question has been reopened to prevent others from using the same answer. In the past sometimes photographers's names were accepted when models were too difficult to ID. There has not been a consistent policy on this and mods have used their judgement.
@barelylegalfan
You know by now that an OP is free to accept an answer without tags. If it's incorrect and reported, then we can address it. Your answer is clearly partial. Answers for videos have to have a free streaming source. This has always been the case.
@Anxiousexy
Some names are banned because of DCMA takedowns.
The question has been reopened to prevent others from using the same answer. In the past sometimes photographers's names were accepted when models were too difficult to ID. There has not been a consistent policy on this and mods have used their judgement.
What's the name of this porn actor?
3,724
23
3
10 years ago
@barelylegalfan
You know by now that an OP is free to accept an answer without tags. If it's incorrect and reported, then we can address it. Your answer is clearly partial. Answers for videos have to have a free streaming source. This has always been the case.
@Anxiousexy
Some names are banned because of DCMA takedowns.
Which pornstar does my sister look like?
2,467
5
7
5 years ago
Which pornstar comes to your mind as soon as you see my sister's face?
1,757
3
8
5 years ago
Any look-alike pornstar of my sister?
1,672
1
2
5 years ago
Which pornstar looks alike my sister?
2,994
5
9
5 years ago
Why certain name tags are banned, even if correct?
* Name Redacted * for exemple, and it can be proved that this is the right format:
https://www.indexxx.com/m/ann-o-fee
The little dot next to the O appears only in one major site, so it can be taken as an AKA
* Name Redacted * for exemple, and it can be proved that this is the right format:
https://www.indexxx.com/m/ann-o-fee
The little dot next to the O appears only in one major site, so it can be taken as an AKA
Where can I find this video?
1,313
9
3
7 years ago
AnsweredThis kind of crap is why I call out the Mods on this page. My answer has all the correct info but gets labelled by some idiot as "partial" and then gets marked correct (yes, I know by the OP) for a response that literally doesn't have the name tag.
Hello. How do we report questionable content? I've hit the site a few times to see on the front page possible illegal content, but do not want to click the link. However, I've noticed there is no report button feature on any other image page. Am I missing something here?
SPONSORED
Other unsolved questions