Do straight guys like this?
Also whenever I search for shemales gangbang, it's usually shemales gangbanging a guy (hard to find with a girl).
Do you (straight) guys enjoy that? Maybe it's gays or girls who like it? Are you like me?
Thanks.
Hard to decide, but mostly agree:
Vanniall
Daisy Taylor
And Jade Venus is pretty, but wouldn't be able to decide between her, Emma Rose or Lena Kelly
There's also Domino Presley or Chanel Santini who have a beautiful face.
So who do you think are the most beautiful t-girls out there? My 3 favs are:
Vanniall
Jade Venus
Daisy Taylor
Sorry, but I just can't get any attraction to her, it's not one attribute, but the whole combination at the same time:
Flat ass with kinda wide shoulders and kinda manly arms+hands, and then the fake tits aren't helping…
I can find her better than e.g. Rubi Maxim, but only because of the face. I understand she's liked by some, but I personally don't find any appeal.
Well beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so different ppl are gonna be attracted to different things. But I think Casey looks a lot like her real life girlfriend Kylie Le Beau in terms of facial features, (nose, lips, jawline) and I don't think anyone would say that Kylie wasn't attractive. Would you?
Yeah, anything about men is a turn off basically.
I just can't find Casey Kisses attractive. She's maybe the only slightly decent from my list, but otherwise there's many other shemales that turn me way more.
Guess it's just me.
A trans girl humping from the top is indeed very sexy, but it's the grunts and moans from the ugly ass dude that ruins the experience for me. But a trans girl topping another trans girl, or a cis female is very hot.
I can agree mostly with your description of those t-girls, but we have to agree to disagree on Casey Kisses. lol I think she's one of the most beautiful women around. Not just trans women, but women period.
I'm attracted to beautiful feminine women, not masculine men, so if a trans girl is beautiful, feminine and identifies as a woman, then I don't consider it gay to be attracted to her. You can consider yourself bi if you want, but if you're not attracted to any men who identify as men, then I wouldn't consider you bi.
Well, a dude on a trans is not that different than a dude on a girl.
I've now learned to ignore the dude's ass, just like when a dude is fucking a girl. It's hot to see a shemale humping from the top.
If it were gay you'll be looking for manly attributes, not feminine. Gay dudes don't look for female trans (but I don't tell anyone I like shemales because many people don't understand and wrongly think it's gay).
____________________________
Those are popular shemales (or at least they seem to be everywhere), but that I just don't see anything in them (too manly) and try to avoid:
Rubi Maxim (manly and ugly face, body could be better)
Aspen Brooks (too wide man shoulders and horse face)
Sarina Valentina (body is too fake, looked better before)
Natassia Dreams (ugly operated ass and face, ugly manly overall)
Casey Kisses (ugly man face, body could be better)
Jessy Dubai (operated manly ass is too ugly, manly face is horrible too)
Nina Lawless (buffed body looks too manly to me)
Tiffany Starr (wide shoulders and overall too manly body)
i want to consider myself straight person but since i'm attracted to attractive shemales/ladyboys with dick (technially they are male) i guess i'm bisexual?? but i'm not attracted to man or manly looking shemale.
@JoeMama1720@WorldsBestPorn@nonse
You seem to really enjoy bringing up arguments that I never even implied, and then using that non-existing argument as the foundation of your reply, which only proves that you have no reply to my actual argument. How you could even argue that I "don't see trans women as women" just because I used the term "woman" in a sentence is the greatest leap in strawman tactics I may have ever seen. So if I said I love "beautiful women", to you that implies that I'm somehow anti-trans women, because I don't love THEM or see THEM as beautiful? Do I always need to make clear what my definition of a woman is before I can use it formally in a sentence? Make that logic make sense.
Actually, it IS you saying that, which is why I'm making a point to specify that your definition of the term is trans-exclusive because you apparently don't see transgender women as women. You're quoting an appeal to a lack of contrary evidence while cherry-picking from a link that specifically highlights the fact that transgirls are now included in what's defined as pegging because you don't want to accept the fact that the term has evolved from what you understand, which makes this discussion moot as it is clearly based on differences in principle.
For instance, take this quotation: "But he cannot make that justification if he doesn't consider trans women women at all. To him it would just be gay sex."
From this conversation, you understand that I don't make a distinction between trans and cis women, but you do - meaning that if you think having sex with transwomen makes a man gay, then you fundamentally renounce the idea of transwomen as women, and that is an arbitrary notion that you choose to support.
This however begs the following question to me: if you think transgirls are a hoax, then why do you even follow them?
I've never seen a definition of "pegging" that didn't contain the word "strap-on". So this isn't my definition of what it is. It simply is the definition of what it is, and there's nothing wrong with that. Even in the link you provided, it mentions a strap-on. People searching for pegging videos would pretty much exclusively find strap-on content, and not trans content, since "pegging" is still considered heterosexual sex, while trans content is considered "other" (Even this site makes the distinction). Again, this is not me saying that. So while a man who considers himself straight may enjoy pegging, he can still justify the act by saying it's coming from a woman. But he cannot make that justification if he doesn't consider trans women women at all. To him it would just be gay sex.
Pegging is defined as 'anal penetration of a man by a woman' - and natural-born women obviously have to use a strap-on because they don't have penises to do the job with. Most transwomen don't have that issue, so functionally what they do is also classed as pegging for that reason. This isn't something I'm just 'pretty sure' about - it's an idea that is supported by sexologists and sexual health educators alike.
Also, why wouldn't a man who enjoys getting pegged be into transwomen when many of them are? This isn't to say that every guy who likes getting pegged will also be into transgirls (some will specifically voice their preference for cis), though in some examples they'll exclusively be into transgirls.
I think the problem with your definition of pegging is also indicative of your definition of sexuality in a wider context, because your insinuation that t-girls topping men is a separate connotation to what pegging is suggests that you don't perceive them as women at all.
I'm pretty sure pegging is literally defined as a woman using a strap-on on a male. To imply that a man who enjoys pegging would definitely be into a trans woman penetrating him isn't true.
Guys being topped by women, trans or otherwise, is what's defined by pegging. It's the same concept either way, whether or not the instrument of use is organic.
The think he's asking specifically about if straight guys are turned on by t-girls topping guys, not pegging.