Should THIS Be in the Straight Section? (Discussion)

@NinNin That could be true. Brazzers/Mindgeek could be trying new things in their adverts in order to see what sticks and what doesn't, because aside from the strapon, I also noticed that both of the ladies in the scene were a little more...plump...than the average pornstar lol

@fijacob700 All we're doing is commenting on the image above.

I don’t think so. Cause I saw the full ad. It's a threesome video. The girl is using dildo. Not trans or something. Most of them are commenting without knowing about it.

@WorldsBestPorn I don't filter out TS or gay content, so the actual content doesn't bother me. Aesthetically, the ad is terrible. It couldn't be worse if they tried. Brazzers is not going to sell memberships with this. It would be a much more appealing ad with a different composition and, say, Riley Reid on the bed. But content-wise, I think it's fine for some but not all in the straight section. Maybe their ad department is finding that the majority of consumers are more open to niches like pegging, and many of the top performers have shot MFM and trans content without losing their fanbase. MindGeek can probably afford the risk of pushing this content forward.

@NinNin

I get that it's considered pegging between a female and a (biological) male, but my question was more directed towards the advert in question, not necessarily the kink itself. Should an advert like this be displayed in straight (mainstream) categories? Because it's just the 1st one I've ever seen that had something in it that appealed to more of a niche audience, when the whole point of these ads is to suck in (pun intended) as many ppl as possible. lol

Oh I didn’t know it was a girl

It's a strapon. Pegging is between a guy and girl. It's straight, no question.

I don’t think it should. Straight is a very finite genre. Guy and girl.

I have nothing against it but if the picture has a dudes dick in another guys mouth, then it should be in gay.