Cut off watermark is a red herring; slightly higher-res, non-marked version can be found:
http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/mst3krules/6800139/1405159781/up_oo17.jp
g
all in all, extremely widespread, rather old (circa 2009 or earlier even), and all but untraceable, considering virtually all relevant communities tried and failed.
Reference
http://www.namethatpornstar.com/thread.php?id=984732
http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/mst3krules/6800139/1405159781/up_oo17.jp
g
all in all, extremely widespread, rather old (circa 2009 or earlier even), and all but untraceable, considering virtually all relevant communities tried and failed.
Reference
http://www.namethatpornstar.com/thread.php?id=984732
Can YOU Name That Porn?
You can still post as anon. Reload after login
neendo confirms this as correct.
Cut off watermark is a red herring; slightly higher-res, non-marked version can be found:
http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/mst3krules/6800139/1405159781/up_oo17.jp
g
all in all, extremely widespread, rather old (circa 2009 or earlier even), and all but untraceable, considering virtually all relevant communities tried and failed.
Reference
http://www.namethatpornstar.com/thread.php?id=984732
http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/mst3krules/6800139/1405159781/up_oo17.jp
g
all in all, extremely widespread, rather old (circa 2009 or earlier even), and all but untraceable, considering virtually all relevant communities tried and failed.
Reference
http://www.namethatpornstar.com/thread.php?id=984732